In Reply to: RE: Not true then... posted by Pat D on March 3, 2011 at 13:34:21:
Correct. HP reviewed in in issue 8 and found its upper midrange peak unbearable, despite being non-boxy sounding and having good imaging. Computer analysis can as quickly create problems when you make the wrong assumptions as it can provide solutions. Early integrated circuits such as the LM301 were also computer designed - and horrible sounding!
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "I can't see that HP and other reviewers had much to do with it." - E-Stat 15:43:26 03/03/11 (11)
- RE: "I can't see that HP and other reviewers had much to do with it." - Pat D 16:22:02 03/03/11 (10)
- You know what - E-Stat 18:13:04 03/03/11 (9)
- RE: You know what - Pat D 19:26:09 03/03/11 (8)
- That's what make the reviews interesting... - mkuller 10:58:19 03/04/11 (7)
- RE: That's what make the reviews interesting... - Pat D 17:14:22 03/04/11 (6)
- If you don't understand ... - mkuller 17:49:38 03/04/11 (5)
- "Trust Your Ears" - kerr 07:03:08 03/06/11 (4)
- Straw man. - Pat D 20:35:57 03/06/11 (3)
- Actually, not a man of any composition - kerr 06:42:39 03/07/11 (2)
- RE: Actually, not a man of any composition - Pat D 08:24:05 03/07/11 (1)
- Ah - thanks! - kerr 09:14:55 03/07/11 (0)