In Reply to: Re: Gush over every component? Not. posted by TomLarson on February 18, 2007 at 13:02:00:
An NHRA drag race is won by the car with the lowest elapsed time. That is a one-dimensional decision matrix.Whether this loudspeaker is preferable to that loudspeaker must involve at least six factors and perhaps a dozen. Most of those factors are subjective--at least in the sense that even though one can measure efficiency, bass extension etc. objectively, where each factor fits in tradeoffs is a subjective personal decision. E.g., the person who pays about $2000 for LS3/5As or clones has made the subjective decision to pass over speakers costing less that go deeper in the bass.
So, as far as I am concerned, that a Class B component costs more than a Class A component does not mean that someone might not prefer the component that ended up in Class B for whatever reason.
And NB, JA has never claimed that all writers have heard and vote on all components eligible for RCL. It is possible I take the cake for covering the greatest number of "off the beaten path" components, and because of that, I often ask JA to follow up on something I think is really really good, or which I think is on the cusp of two categories. I think that the fine print does a good job of letting people know, for example, if a component has only received column coverage and only from one person, versus a full review and more than one other voice.
But the piece only ST or I have heard might be just the ticket for you, while something that has had a full review and in addition WP, MF, and AD have weighed in on, might strike you as a nothingburger.
From that perspective, I agree with JA's inclusive policy.
Cheerio,
JM
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Classes in Stereophile - John Marks 17:25:07 02/18/07 (4)
- Re: Classes in Stereophile - Rob Doorack 07:11:35 02/19/07 (2)
- OK, I got that backwards - John Marks 09:44:42 02/19/07 (0)
- Re: Classes in Stereophile - TomLarson 07:40:12 02/19/07 (0)
- Re: Classes in Stereophile - TomLarson 19:31:57 02/18/07 (0)