In Reply to: Example earlier in the thread, agreed to by two others (three with Clark). posted by Pat D on June 9, 2006 at 16:54:12:
You were very specific, you laid out the propositions and claimed those individuals said that the one followed from the other.You have been asked to demonstrate your claim. I suggest you do so or retract it. Should you be incapable I suggest that in addition to retracting you do the honorable thing and apologize to the individuals you insulted.
No Guru, No Method, No Teacher
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Pat you ridiculed people, whom you named, for faulty logical thinking. - bjh 17:10:47 06/09/06 (7)
- It's a fallacy so common here . . . - Pat D 18:06:07 06/09/06 (6)
- Just being an I-Child I see. No surprise. nt - bjh 18:29:47 06/09/06 (5)
- They're big boys, bjh. Apparently you aren't. - Pat D 18:44:16 06/09/06 (4)
- You have provided us with just one more demonstration - bjh 08:28:00 06/10/06 (3)
- More ad hominem remarks, and unintelligible ones at that. (n) - Pat D 10:51:52 06/10/06 (2)
- No Pat it's not ad hominem in fact I have been perfectly consistent and on topic throughout, namely - bjh 11:39:17 06/10/06 (1)
- You'd better look up what they said. - Pat D 15:03:10 06/10/06 (0)