Oh, don't play dense just for the sake of argument - Charles Hansen

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - No one cares what you think - awsmone 05:09:08 06/03/06 (95)

You get what you pay for - Frihed89 00:29:23 06/06/06 (0)

That may be true - Bruce from DC 11:09:36 06/05/06 (1)

Re: That may be true - regmac 19:09:24 06/05/06 (0)

I agree but wonder why both you and I spend any time posting anything on the AA. - Norm 17:24:33 06/03/06 (1)

"We have no way of knowing which is which." It's a problem in libraries too. nt - clarkjohnsen 12:10:53 06/04/06 (0)

The internets [sic] provides infinite opportunity for debate and information - suits_me 15:29:14 06/03/06 (0)

When everyone agrees there is usually no thinking at all -- that's not good - Richard BassNut Greene 09:53:18 06/03/06 (25)

This from someone who dismisses global warming - suits_me 15:26:12 06/03/06 (1)

You have your beliefs (hysterical data), I base my conclusions on real data (historical data). - Richard BassNut Greene 09:44:42 06/05/06 (1)

Clarification - John Atkinson 12:09:53 06/03/06 (2)

Not very clear at all - Richard BassNut Greene 10:01:58 06/05/06 (1)

Well, was he, at least, getting warmer? (nt) - suits_me 19:53:55 06/06/06 (0)

important details - Sue Kraft 10:11:34 06/03/06 (19)

I'm sure Mr. Nut plans to stop parroting DBT - Bruce Kendall 22:01:35 06/03/06 (18)

What people claim to hear versus what they really hear when brand names are hidden is the most important debate in audio - Richard BassNut Greene 10:18:57 06/05/06 (15)

Since you're on the subject of beliefs, you probably should have begun the above sentence, "I believe..." - Bersani 15:53:15 06/05/06 (14)

This is where their belief system falls down. - markrohr 12:14:31 06/07/06 (12)

You are correct - kerr 13:11:51 06/07/06 (11)

Another logic lesson. - Pat D 09:18:43 06/09/06 (10)

Flaccid rhetoric! - bjh 15:26:19 06/09/06 (9)

Example earlier in the thread, agreed to by two others (three with Clark). - Pat D 16:54:12 06/09/06 (8)

Pat you ridiculed people, whom you named, for faulty logical thinking. - bjh 17:10:47 06/09/06 (7)

It's a fallacy so common here . . . - Pat D 18:06:07 06/09/06 (6)

Just being an I-Child I see. No surprise. nt - bjh 18:29:47 06/09/06 (5)

They're big boys, bjh. Apparently you aren't. - Pat D 18:44:16 06/09/06 (4)

You have provided us with just one more demonstration - bjh 08:28:00 06/10/06 (3)

More ad hominem remarks, and unintelligible ones at that. (n) - Pat D 10:51:52 06/10/06 (2)

No Pat it's not ad hominem in fact I have been perfectly consistent and on topic throughout, namely - bjh 11:39:17 06/10/06 (1)

You'd better look up what they said. - Pat D 15:03:10 06/10/06 (0)

Point to Bersani! nt - clarkjohnsen 08:02:51 06/07/06 (0)

Well, if folks stopped parroting anti-DBT misinformation - Pat D 10:08:56 06/05/06 (1)

Misinformation is all that's left when three decades of data from objective tests never support your beliefs! - Richard BassNut Greene 13:55:43 06/05/06 (0)

Re: Yep, it is pointless - theaudiohobby 07:00:21 06/03/06 (58)

Re: Yep, it is pointless - Charles Hansen 13:34:47 06/03/06 (50)

Say what? - hexenboden 20:11:26 06/04/06 (0)

Stuff and nonsense. - Pat D 17:25:23 06/03/06 (7)

Uhmm... - Charles Hansen 17:30:58 06/03/06 (6)

Do you read the posts before you misinterpret them, launch a character attack and then announce your mind is closed? - Richard BassNut Greene 14:08:56 06/05/06 (2)

Nope -- I can do all that without bothering to read the post. [nt] - Charles Hansen 14:36:53 06/05/06 (1)

The great danger of multi-tasking is that all the tasks are done poorly - Richard BassNut Greene 15:11:11 06/05/06 (0)

You've really gone off the deep end. - Pat D 20:25:40 06/03/06 (2)

It's not any one thing you said Pat, it's more - bjh 21:13:23 06/03/06 (1)

Do you read minds now? - Pat D 14:50:16 06/04/06 (0)

The better question is why do you defend the - bjh 15:15:01 06/03/06 (40)

I'm sure this will be hard for you to understand - Charles Hansen 19:39:15 06/03/06 (39)

What are "mechanical resonances of the strands"? (nt) - hexenboden 20:15:51 06/04/06 (4)

Re: What are "mechanical resonances of the strands"? (nt) - Charles Hansen 20:26:34 06/04/06 (3)

"You can measure it if you try." - hexenboden 14:47:38 06/05/06 (2)

Not likely... - robert young 20:17:25 06/05/06 (1)

Of course (nt) - hexenboden 09:47:08 06/06/06 (0)

Re: I'm sure this will be hard for you to understand - john curl 14:24:31 06/04/06 (0)

Ok, but Charles, you *did* know the Cardas wire..... - Rick W 10:46:55 06/04/06 (7)

Re: Ok, but Charles, you *did* know the Cardas wire..... - hexenboden 20:18:32 06/04/06 (4)

You have completely missed the point, which...... - Rick W 08:42:05 06/05/06 (3)

No, you are... - hexenboden 14:40:28 06/05/06 (2)

Amazing. Good night, and good luck. nt - Rick W 15:41:27 06/05/06 (1)

And good night to you too. nt - hexenboden 21:27:26 06/05/06 (0)

Oh, don't play dense just for the sake of argument - Charles Hansen 12:43:14 06/04/06 (1)

LOL. Yeah, we wouldn't want to require tweaks to come up to the lowest common denominator. nt - Rick W 14:04:05 06/04/06 (0)

Re: Is Tweaking Still Alive & Kicking? - geoffkait 04:23:14 06/04/06 (0)

Re: I'm sure this will be hard for you to understand - May Belt 02:40:24 06/04/06 (2)

Shorter posts might be read (nt) - hexenboden 20:19:37 06/04/06 (0)

"Ridicule, ridicule, ridicule." All the attackers employ that smarmy technique in their "debunking". - clarkjohnsen 12:05:42 06/04/06 (0)

Mr Hansen let me tell you something ... - bjh 20:56:21 06/03/06 (20)

I hate to butt in - unclestu52 01:18:49 06/04/06 (4)

"The so called 'scientific' minds automatically dismiss... and never investigate any further." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 11:53:26 06/04/06 (1)

Why should they? The burden of proof is on those who claim something works. - Pat D 10:05:27 06/05/06 (0)

Well said. nt - Norm 09:19:14 06/04/06 (1)

Indeed! (mt) - Stephæn 10:12:11 06/04/06 (0)

What's the craziest thing you ever spent $40.00 on? - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 01:03:59 06/04/06 (11)

"So why do I choose to dismiss the GSIC?" Because Jim Austin told you to? nt - clarkjohnsen 11:55:54 06/04/06 (4)

Who the hell is Jim Austin???????????? - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 15:41:33 06/04/06 (1)

Exactly. [nt] - Charles Hansen 15:42:42 06/04/06 (0)

That's right -- after all, he has a PhD. He has to be right. [nt] - Charles Hansen 12:38:26 06/04/06 (1)

And well-educated as he is, you'll never catch him with a Chip on his shoulder... nt - clarkjohnsen 13:04:30 06/04/06 (0)

I didn't buy it, - unclestu52 11:20:26 06/04/06 (0)

"I'll bet you $50.00 they make the drinks taste better!" Use "prayed over" water for mix just to be certain! - bjh 06:17:08 06/04/06 (4)

Now you're talking!!! I wonder if prayed over ice cubes - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 08:04:32 06/04/06 (3)

Re: Now you're talking!!! I wonder if prayed over ice cubes - bjh 08:53:52 06/04/06 (2)

Re: Now you're talking!!! I wonder if prayed over ice cubes - J-PMatt@Comcast.Net 19:09:05 06/04/06 (1)

I dunno ... the competition tells folks - bjh 20:41:45 06/04/06 (0)

Almost agree (surprise!) - Charles Hansen 22:14:39 06/03/06 (2)

Why listen... - Wellfed 12:32:53 06/04/06 (1)

I had almost forgotten! nt - clarkjohnsen 13:06:37 06/04/06 (0)

"[No] credible explanation for how it works." Hmm... - clarkjohnsen 08:16:24 06/03/06 (5)

Clark, why don't you just tell us... - KlausR. 10:10:22 06/03/06 (4)

And you deserve to know, why, exactly? (After the way you've behaved...) nt - clarkjohnsen 11:43:12 06/04/06 (3)

Is that "I can't tell you" or "I won't tell you" ? nt - KlausR. 08:27:27 06/06/06 (2)

More like, "Why bother?" nt - clarkjohnsen 08:49:54 06/06/06 (1)

Because fora are intended to share knowledge, not to say " I know but I won't tell you, go and find out yourself" - KlausR. 10:03:08 06/06/06 (0)

Re: Yep, it is pointless - Jim Austin 07:39:00 06/03/06 (0)

The REAL problem is that far fewer care what the GUARDIAN thinks.... - Ivan303 06:56:54 06/03/06 (0)

I agree - Sue Kraft 06:19:56 06/03/06 (1)

Re: I agree too - Peter Breuninger 07:15:44 06/03/06 (0)

I disagree (respectfully of course)... - Jim Austin 05:24:17 06/03/06 (1)

Follow Ups

Oh, don't play dense just for the sake of argument - Charles Hansen 12:43:14 06/04/06 (1)

LOL. Yeah, we wouldn't want to require tweaks to come up to the lowest common denominator. nt - Rick W 14:04:05 06/04/06 (0)