In Reply to: You are correct posted by kerr on June 7, 2006 at 13:11:51:
Let's take a classic "if-then" statement:A) "If you see a bank robbery, you should call the police."
But if we cannot turn derive the next proposition from it:
B) "If you do not see a bank robbery, you should NOT call the police."
Proposition B) is rather silly, because there might be ever so many other reasons to call the police.
A1) If you expect to hear differences, you probably will hear them."
B2) If you do not expect to hear differences, you probably will not hear them.
It's the same thing. B2) does not follow, even they tubeguy, markrohr, aand you seem to think it does. A1) is simply an illustration. Perception is not a simple process. Biases aside, we are simply built to perceive differences, and willy nilly, do so.
Now, I have addressed this matter before, and jj has done so with much more authority. So here you are, read what jj has to say by following the link to a subthread:
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Another logic lesson. - Pat D 09:18:43 06/09/06 (10)
- Flaccid rhetoric! - bjh 15:26:19 06/09/06 (9)
- Example earlier in the thread, agreed to by two others (three with Clark). - Pat D 16:54:12 06/09/06 (8)
- Pat you ridiculed people, whom you named, for faulty logical thinking. - bjh 17:10:47 06/09/06 (7)
- It's a fallacy so common here . . . - Pat D 18:06:07 06/09/06 (6)
- Just being an I-Child I see. No surprise. nt - bjh 18:29:47 06/09/06 (5)
- They're big boys, bjh. Apparently you aren't. - Pat D 18:44:16 06/09/06 (4)
- You have provided us with just one more demonstration - bjh 08:28:00 06/10/06 (3)
- More ad hominem remarks, and unintelligible ones at that. (n) - Pat D 10:51:52 06/10/06 (2)
- No Pat it's not ad hominem in fact I have been perfectly consistent and on topic throughout, namely - bjh 11:39:17 06/10/06 (1)
- You'd better look up what they said. - Pat D 15:03:10 06/10/06 (0)