Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Not very clear at all

Your Stereophile editorial throwing mud at blind tests included no supporting data or experiences.

You completely failed to mention your belief that one-third of over 100 blind tests you participated in had faulty experiment designs.

That "one-third" belief was by far the best "ammunition" you had to support your anti-blind test editorial, yet was not included.

One key to good writing is to state a conclusion, and then follow it with your best points in support of the conclusion.

Your one-page editorial throwing mud at blind tests merely told readers if humans are involved, mistakes can be made. Ho hum. It was amazing that no supporting data and experiences could fit in that page.
.
.
.


Richard BassNut Greene
My Stereo is MUCH BETTER than Your Stereo


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.