In Reply to: Re: Inverted logic (oxymoron) posted by Brian Cheney on February 20, 2007 at 09:27:19:
You may have thought the set of measurements used were the right measurements for speakers.But after you listened to the speakers, you found out those measurements were, at best, not 100% accurate (for your ears), or at worst, were not the right measurements at all to identify speakers you will like in your room.
Of course you are using only one set of ears in one listening room to claim measurements don't always work -- we have to ASSUME most other listeners would have the same opinion, and we have to ASSUME the speakers would sound just as bad in another room (the sound quality description reminds me of Blose Acoustimess Shreikers).
Bad measurements will usually correlate with speakers that sound bad, or are at least colored.
"Good measurements" will usually correlate with good speakers.
But no measurements are perfect.
Measurements may not have perfect correlation with subjective auditions in our own rooms, but they are much better than flipping a coin when it comes to deciding which of hundreds of speaker brands and models we ought to audition before we buy speakers.
.
.
.
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- If you didn't like the sound of the speakers, then how could you say the measurements were good? That makes no sense. - Richard BassNut Greene 08:37:59 02/21/07 (17)
- Re: If you didn't like the sound of the speakers, then how could you say the measurements were good? That makes no sen - Brian Cheney 09:09:00 02/21/07 (16)
- If I were a manufacturer, I would be polite to everyone with my posts. This is obviously not your policy. - Richard BassNut Greene 09:21:53 02/21/07 (15)
- Richard, perhaps the following quote might have some meaning to you: - robert young 10:41:19 02/21/07 (14)
- "Just because you design speakers that get good reviews doesn't mean we have to agree with everything ... you write!" - Richard BassNut Greene 11:39:42 02/21/07 (13)
- Richard, it isn't about Cheney, it's about you. - robert young 11:52:06 02/21/07 (12)
- And your purpose in this thread is to do what? - Richard BassNut Greene 12:26:15 02/21/07 (11)
- My purpose should have been clear, even to you. - robert young 14:47:08 02/21/07 (10)
- "you wouldn't have taken such an aggrwessive stance" - Richard BassNut Greene 08:04:39 02/22/07 (2)
- Always fun to highlight typos, isn't it Nut? - robert young 13:41:42 02/22/07 (1)
- Always like to highlight the most accurate sections of your posts! - Richard BassNut Greene 11:07:38 02/25/07 (0)
- Re: My purpose should have been clear, even to you. - Brian Cheney 16:53:03 02/21/07 (6)
- Whoa! Thank you - Sordidman 08:29:45 02/23/07 (0)
- "One must blow pretty hard to make any kind of impression on Mr. Nut, who is so set in his biases and misconceptions..." - Richard BassNut Greene 08:20:45 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: My purpose should have been clear, even to you. - Andy.G 19:11:42 02/21/07 (3)
- Re: My purpose should have been clear, even to you. - Brian Cheney 19:20:23 02/21/07 (2)
- Re: My purpose should have been clear, even to you. - Andy.G 19:49:15 02/21/07 (1)
- Andy you're rattling Cheney's cage too much -- just give him the benefit of the doubt ... - Richard BassNut Greene 09:11:03 02/22/07 (0)