In Reply to: RE: The 4 ways to decode digital posted by Thorsten on October 14, 2015 at 20:00:25:
...but if the claims are true....Switching at 352 kHz is not low.
And they re-format from one digital code to another. "Conversion" means digital to analog, in the traditional sense.
The merit of this is not the subject here - and I won't take sides...
Edits: 10/14/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - J. Phelan 20:23:29 10/14/15 (14)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - Thorsten 21:36:41 10/14/15 (13)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - J. Phelan 09:09:33 10/15/15 (12)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - Thorsten 18:05:31 10/15/15 (11)
- Guys, I think you're both right - Dave_K 09:44:18 10/19/15 (1)
- RE: Guys, I think you're both right - J. Phelan 19:34:27 10/19/15 (0)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - Tony Lauck 19:28:39 10/15/15 (0)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - J. Phelan 19:09:40 10/15/15 (7)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - Thorsten 20:25:42 10/15/15 (6)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - Tony Lauck 22:30:38 10/15/15 (3)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - Thorsten 20:26:32 10/16/15 (1)
- Gainsetting, and other aspects of audio engineering in the mid 1960's - Tony Lauck 11:53:23 10/17/15 (0)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - J. Phelan 09:24:49 10/16/15 (0)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - J. Phelan 20:35:10 10/15/15 (1)
- RE: The 4 ways to decode digital - Thorsten 21:26:46 10/15/15 (0)