In Reply to: Whose lies and retractions you guys worry about? posted by tlyyra on December 16, 2007 at 11:54:19:
As I understand you have taken Atkinson to task for the following statement that appeared in Stereophile, As We See It, Absolute Issues, September, 1988:
Work by Stanley Lipshitz in the late '70s (footnote 9), using carefully organized double-blind testing, confirmed that a reversal of absolute signal polarity will be subtly audible on music to a 99% confidence limit! (Indeed, it is one of the few things that can be reliably detected with double-blind testing.)
source (see page two)
You have provided as reference information published at the web page ABX Double Blind Test Results: Polarity as evidence that the above statement is in error.
Specifically the tests by Van der Kooy/Lipshitz did not demonstrate the audibility of absolute signal polarity on music but rather with Training Signals.
Now the footnote Atkinson provided as reference cited the following:
"A little understood factor in A/B testing," The BAS Speaker, March 1979, followed by "On the Audibility of Midrange Phase Distortion in Audio Systems" (with John Vanderkooy and Mark Pocock), JAES, Vol.30 No.9, September 1982.
These sources are different that the one you cited and hence raise the question of what is contained in the references Atkinson used? Specifically is it possible that the sources Atkinson use contained the on music vs. Training Signals error? Have you examined the materials and confirmed that this was not the case, have you produced this evidence in posts here (or for that matter elsewhere)?
As you have used this incident, what was contained in the 1988 article, to question SF's/Atkinson's "honesty in reporting"... you wtote Usually, we of course refer by this term ("honesty in reporting") to qualities like fairness and accuracy... I should think you did indeed do your homework to, as the saying goes, cross your t's and dot your i's.
If you would be so kind to point out your investigations into Atkinson's sources, or at least comment on this interesting question I would appreciate it.
Everything matters, don't forget to tweak your placebos!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - bjh 13:30:27 12/16/07 (155)
- RE: Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - andy_c 09:03:46 12/17/07 (130)
- RE: Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - rdf 09:30:04 12/17/07 (4)
- RE: Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - andy_c 09:40:15 12/17/07 (3)
- RE: Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - tlyyra 09:43:26 12/17/07 (2)
- RE: Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - andy_c 09:55:48 12/17/07 (1)
- RE: Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - tlyyra 10:04:11 12/17/07 (0)
- BTW... - bjh 09:26:39 12/17/07 (3)
- Atkinson has been offered many chances to set the record straight. - tlyyra 09:52:31 12/17/07 (2)
- What does he have to set straight? If he examines what he wrote - bjh 10:48:13 12/17/07 (1)
- Blessed be the faithful. - tlyyra 11:04:22 12/17/07 (0)
- I seems clear to me that Atkinson *was not in error* based upon the relevant quote. - bjh 09:21:58 12/17/07 (119)
- RE: "I believe..." - tlyyra 09:27:14 12/17/07 (118)
- To be entirely clear the Retraction I mention should come from you. - bjh 10:03:31 12/17/07 (117)
- RE: To be entirely clear the Retraction I mention should come from you. - John Atkinson 13:56:49 12/17/07 (110)
- Would you now also care to point out... - tlyyra 14:07:53 12/17/07 (108)
- More Remedial Statistics - John Atkinson 14:35:18 12/17/07 (107)
- Thank you. - tlyyra 15:12:38 12/17/07 (10)
- RE: Thank you. - John Atkinson 16:26:12 12/17/07 (1)
- RE: Thank you. - tlyyra 17:07:52 12/17/07 (0)
- Yes or No session... - bjh 15:25:55 12/17/07 (7)
- Nice, thanks for helping out. - tlyyra 15:52:46 12/17/07 (6)
- RE: Nice, thanks for helping out. - bjh 16:35:11 12/17/07 (5)
- The lesson learned is simply that... - tlyyra 17:22:15 12/17/07 (4)
- A story about a manufacturing engineer I used to work with... - andy_c 09:16:22 12/18/07 (1)
- Good one... :-) - tlyyra 10:55:43 12/18/07 (0)
- Well at least I would have to say that ... - bjh 17:39:28 12/17/07 (1)
- Now I'll put it really simply. - tlyyra 03:40:40 12/18/07 (0)
- RE: More Remedial Statistics - andy_c 14:45:43 12/17/07 (95)
- RE: More Remedial Statistics - rdf 15:22:44 12/17/07 (94)
- RE: More Remedial Statistics - andy_c 15:59:28 12/17/07 (11)
- RE: More Remedial Statistics - rdf 18:10:37 12/17/07 (4)
- Does it say ANYWHERE in the BASS article... - tlyyra 02:24:19 12/18/07 (2)
- RE: Does it say ANYWHERE in the BASS article... - rdf 08:02:35 12/18/07 (1)
- RE: Does it say ANYWHERE in the BASS article... - tlyyra 11:24:32 12/18/07 (0)
- RE: More Remedial Statistics - andy_c 18:36:48 12/17/07 (0)
- If I may add one more explanatory note re: that "circumstantial" connection. - tlyyra 16:18:14 12/17/07 (5)
- Understood. - andy_c 16:29:04 12/17/07 (4)
- That would indeed be great. - tlyyra 17:26:08 12/17/07 (3)
- RE: That would indeed be great. - andy_c 17:58:40 12/17/07 (2)
- OK, though I'm not sure what's still uncertain. - tlyyra 02:29:02 12/18/07 (1)
- RE: OK, though I'm not sure what's still uncertain. - andy_c 07:50:33 12/18/07 (0)
- More stuff if interested. - tlyyra 15:35:15 12/17/07 (81)
- "...in plain olde English. " - robert young 17:24:16 12/17/07 (80)
- RE: "...in plain olde English. " - John Atkinson 03:56:17 12/18/07 (42)
- Then it seems neither do you. - tlyyra 04:05:59 12/18/07 (41)
- RE: Then it seems neither do you. - John Atkinson 08:32:16 12/18/07 (40)
- RE: Then it seems neither do you. - tlyyra 12:46:39 12/18/07 (39)
- "efforts to undermine the questioner's character" - robert young 13:00:34 12/18/07 (38)
- Except that I have not said any of that. - tlyyra 13:09:49 12/18/07 (37)
- Au contraire! - bjh 16:49:49 12/18/07 (36)
- One more time, but then I won't play your game any more. - tlyyra 02:58:17 12/19/07 (35)
- No, that's right. - robert young 05:00:39 12/19/07 (34)
- That's your conclusion and I am not objecting. - tlyyra 06:00:30 12/19/07 (33)
- " point of grammar????" - robert young 07:58:25 12/19/07 (32)
- Point of semantics. - tlyyra 02:59:25 12/20/07 (10)
- "Is that all you've got left????". - robert young 05:35:39 12/20/07 (9)
- RE: "abuse of language" - tlyyra 06:22:21 12/20/07 (8)
- Please help with a clarification. - robert young 07:00:39 12/20/07 (7)
- Can you describe what the point would be? - tlyyra 08:19:35 12/20/07 (6)
- No, it is at the heart of the point. - robert young 09:35:36 12/20/07 (5)
- RE: No, it is at the heart of the point. - John Atkinson 10:54:33 12/20/07 (4)
- I believe you were expected to give up a limb, - bjh 13:11:29 12/20/07 (1)
- I'm afraid JA stopped patting on your back some time ago already. - tlyyra 13:50:11 12/20/07 (0)
- RE: "I have acknowledged that I may have made an error." - tlyyra 11:30:31 12/20/07 (0)
- Yes, it's time to move on. Nothing to be gained here. - robert young 11:15:29 12/20/07 (0)
- RE: " point of grammar????" - John Atkinson 08:38:22 12/19/07 (20)
- "[Your] Assumed Guilt"? Are you trying to become an Audio Asylum martyr? - tlyyra 02:58:14 12/20/07 (17)
- Why is this so hard for you?? - robert young 05:30:34 12/20/07 (14)
- Just one substantive question left. - tlyyra 06:28:24 12/20/07 (13)
- Administrivia: Stop spreading falsehoods or ... - Ted Smith 11:45:16 12/20/07 (0)
- RE: Just one substantive question left. - pande 08:40:47 12/20/07 (5)
- You are overly dramatic. - tlyyra 08:46:37 12/20/07 (4)
- RE: You are overly dramatic. - pande 09:33:57 12/20/07 (3)
- So was I... - tlyyra 05:12:23 12/21/07 (2)
- RE: So was I... - pande 11:13:02 12/21/07 (1)
- Good for you. - tlyyra 10:05:24 12/22/07 (0)
- If you believe what you wrote, then you are ... - robert young 06:48:27 12/20/07 (5)
- Re: "Intelligent debate..." - tlyyra 06:55:36 12/20/07 (4)
- "leave us intelligently debating!" - robert young 06:59:04 12/20/07 (3)
- That was a parody, Robert dear. - tlyyra 08:28:27 12/20/07 (1)
- All your exclamation points gave away the parody. - robert young 09:29:28 12/20/07 (0)
- My only regret is that I wasted my - bjh 07:57:48 12/20/07 (0)
- Sigh... - John Atkinson 04:19:30 12/20/07 (1)
- RE: Sigh... - tlyyra 05:22:33 12/20/07 (0)
- RE: " point of grammar????" - andy_c 19:28:38 12/19/07 (1)
- Thanks - John Atkinson 04:22:49 12/20/07 (0)
- I rather prefer... - tlyyra 03:12:34 12/18/07 (36)
- RE: I rather prefer... - morricab 04:27:23 12/18/07 (35)
- According to which thesis? - tlyyra 04:41:14 12/18/07 (34)
- It's from your own link!!! - robert young 04:52:27 12/18/07 (33)
- "You can't have your cake and eat it too. " No? - bjh 07:04:37 12/18/07 (0)
- What are you talking about? - tlyyra 06:22:38 12/18/07 (31)
- RE: What are you talking about? - morricab 08:33:44 12/18/07 (30)
- Fine. - tlyyra 13:02:15 12/18/07 (29)
- RE: Fine. - morricab 02:29:24 12/19/07 (28)
- RE: Fine. - tlyyra 03:22:03 12/19/07 (27)
- RE: Fine. - morricab 09:03:55 12/19/07 (26)
- Debunking / Policing on AA / Correcting Errors - tlyyra 04:12:31 12/20/07 (9)
- Administrivia: Stop spreading falsehoods or ... - Ted Smith 11:41:29 12/20/07 (3)
- RE: Administrivia: Stop spreading falsehoods or ... - tlyyra 12:09:25 12/20/07 (2)
- RE: Administrivia: Stop spreading falsehoods or ... - Ted Smith 12:16:06 12/20/07 (1)
- RE: Administrivia: Stop spreading falsehoods or ... - tlyyra 14:03:19 12/20/07 (0)
- Correcting Errors - John Atkinson 04:29:46 12/20/07 (4)
- Correcting More Errors - tlyyra 05:39:35 12/20/07 (3)
- RE: Correcting More Errors - John Atkinson 06:41:51 12/20/07 (2)
- Why not just answer the questions? They would settle it all so very quickly. - tlyyra 08:17:37 12/20/07 (1)
- I'm only replying so you can't delete it. - robert young 10:14:03 12/20/07 (0)
- RE: Fine. - andy_c 20:47:09 12/19/07 (12)
- RE: Fine. - morricab 02:19:23 12/20/07 (11)
- Yes, you are missing something. - tlyyra 03:25:06 12/20/07 (10)
- RE: Yes, you are missing something. - morricab 03:15:50 12/21/07 (9)
- 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - tlyyra 04:06:27 12/21/07 (8)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - John Atkinson 11:50:25 12/21/07 (6)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - tlyyra 11:30:02 12/22/07 (5)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - John Atkinson 14:57:16 12/22/07 (4)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - tlyyra 05:37:18 12/23/07 (3)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - John Atkinson 08:01:18 12/24/07 (2)
- "Semantic forests" and still no evidence you can cite? - tlyyra 08:59:06 12/26/07 (1)
- More mindreading, it appears - John Atkinson 13:51:11 12/27/07 (0)
- RE: 'Interpretation' and 'reinterpretation' - morricab 06:23:28 12/21/07 (0)
- Objection, Your Honor - bjh 09:37:39 12/19/07 (2)
- Right, you have no arguments... - tlyyra 03:27:33 12/20/07 (0)
- RE: Objection, Your Honor - morricab 02:16:49 12/20/07 (0)
- You can thank member andy_c for the research, - bjh 14:03:47 12/17/07 (0)
- Basic math, and another friendly suggestion for you. - tlyyra 10:11:41 12/17/07 (5)
- You again need reminding that your charge of "totally false" pertaining to - bjh 10:28:26 12/17/07 (4)
- 99% instead of 53% is not totally false? - tlyyra 10:46:38 12/17/07 (3)
- Remedial Statistics? - John Atkinson 13:49:47 12/17/07 (1)
- Is it just me or ... - bjh 15:05:02 12/17/07 (0)
- As to the matter at hand I have said all I have to say. However on another point ... - bjh 11:01:41 12/17/07 (0)
- Exactly. - tlyyra 09:19:23 12/17/07 (0)
- Here's a piece of advise. Or two. - tlyyra 05:47:08 12/17/07 (2)
- RE: Here's a piece of advise. Or two. - morricab 03:03:09 12/21/07 (1)
- RE: Here's a piece of advise. Or two. - tlyyra 11:54:01 12/22/07 (0)
- RE: Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - rdf 13:41:33 12/16/07 (20)
- RE: Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - tlyyra 05:40:35 12/17/07 (6)
- RE: Question RE: Atkinson - DBT/Absolute Signal Polarity - rdf 09:11:29 12/17/07 (1)
- See my other responses. - tlyyra 09:39:03 12/17/07 (0)
- "Atkinson seems to regard it much more highly than you. See my reply to bjh below." - bjh 08:41:21 12/17/07 (3)
- What are you talking about? - tlyyra 08:56:53 12/17/07 (2)
- RE: What are you talking about? - rdf 20:49:10 12/17/07 (1)
- I asked essentially the - bjh 07:43:13 12/18/07 (0)
- Actually I believe many of the tests referenced on the ABX site have been published. However - bjh 13:49:14 12/16/07 (12)
- RE:"little information is provided" - tlyyra 05:52:33 12/17/07 (11)
- "They've felt inclined to (mis)quote the score numerous times in (assumed) support of their own positions." - bjh 08:30:26 12/17/07 (10)
- You already did that for me. - tlyyra 08:46:15 12/17/07 (9)
- ATKINSON DID NOT CITE THE ABX WEB PAGE AS SOURCE! - bjh 09:02:32 12/17/07 (8)
- Please read what I said. - tlyyra 09:11:06 12/17/07 (7)
- RE: Please read what I said. - morricab 03:18:35 12/21/07 (6)
- RE: Please read what I said. - tlyyra 05:52:44 12/21/07 (5)
- RE: Please read what I said. - morricab 08:07:33 12/21/07 (4)
- RE: Please read what I said. - tlyyra 12:03:28 12/22/07 (3)
- RE: Please read what I said. - morricab 02:20:24 12/24/07 (2)
- Six words. - tlyyra 05:52:38 12/24/07 (1)
- RE: Six words. - morricab 15:07:02 12/25/07 (0)