In Reply to: Re: Uncritically positive commentary on Cheever’s thesis posted by andy_c on January 5, 2005 at 11:17:57:
“Certainly some of this knowledge is contained in articles that don't exactly give one a woody from reading them :-).â€This is sooo true, but the articles and papers should at least be interesting in an engineering point of view ;-).
“But by ignoring them just because they don't, one might just be limiting the number of useful tools in the toolbox of available ideas. “I don’t ignore them but many of the “High feedback is good (And sometimes God)†and “If it can’t be measured it can’t be heard†type of guys really ignore the “subjective annoyance to the listener†we encounter.
Enjoy Creating / Mad Man Harju
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Articles that don't exactly give one a woody - MAD MAN HARJU 12:44:44 01/05/05 (13)
- Re: Audible differences that can't be measured - andy_c 18:55:47 01/05/05 (12)
- Re: Audible differences that can't be measured - Jon Risch 18:06:27 01/06/05 (0)
- Re: Audible differences - MAD MAN HARJU 04:07:17 01/06/05 (10)
- Re: Audible differences - john curl 10:14:18 01/10/05 (1)
- Re: Audible differences - john curl 15:27:49 01/10/05 (0)
- Re: Audible differences - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 17:49:37 01/06/05 (7)
- Same ol' house of cards - Commuteman 11:22:41 01/07/05 (6)
- Re: Same ol' house of cards - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 04:43:29 01/08/05 (5)
- A little off base... - Commuteman 09:16:35 01/08/05 (3)
- Re: A little off base... - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 13:07:33 01/08/05 (2)
- OhhMyyyGoood - MAD MAN HARJU 13:25:06 01/08/05 (1)
- Re: OhhMyyyGoood - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 14:43:38 01/08/05 (0)
- Re: Same ol' house of cards - MAD MAN HARJU 07:08:38 01/08/05 (0)