In Reply to: What are you, the AA police? posted by nightdoggy on February 21, 2007 at 17:23:43:
and knows whereof he speaks. he, like some of the rest of us, recognizes BULLoney when he sees it.
...regards...tr
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - DUT Return Policy - bjh 17:45:36 02/20/07 (64)
- Re: DUT Return Policy - andy19191 12:11:53 02/21/07 (5)
- Oh, Mr. audiophile expert... - mkuller 12:55:40 02/21/07 (4)
- Re: Oh, Mr. audiophile expert... - andy19191 01:18:49 02/22/07 (0)
- What are you, the AA police? - nightdoggy 17:23:43 02/21/07 (2)
- no, he's a past reviewer for tas - hifitommy 19:10:27 02/21/07 (1)
- I get it (nt) - nightdoggy 19:15:21 02/21/07 (0)
- Unlike other components... - mkuller 10:15:51 02/21/07 (35)
- Another VERY GOOD REASON to not want cables back... - Al Sekela 12:30:35 02/22/07 (3)
- Well that certainly justifies it! - nightdoggy 16:45:10 02/22/07 (2)
- Re: You continue to presume.... - alan m. kafton 17:37:53 02/22/07 (1)
- No I do not presume the worst in anybody - nightdoggy 10:29:19 02/23/07 (0)
- Re: manufacturers usually do not reuse cables or want them back. - cdb 19:06:39 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Unlike other components... - bjh 10:36:10 02/21/07 (29)
- So what about free... - mkuller 12:08:44 02/21/07 (22)
- If it is understood to be a gift - nightdoggy 16:50:27 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: If it is understood to be a gift - alan m. kafton 17:40:14 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: Good point. [nt] - alan m. kafton 12:32:03 02/21/07 (0)
- Pretty simple answer. - Rick W 12:29:22 02/21/07 (1)
- Re: Another good point. [nt] - alan m. kafton 12:32:37 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: So what about free... - bjh 12:21:17 02/21/07 (16)
- Cables aren't components... - mkuller 12:24:53 02/21/07 (15)
- Re: On this I disagree.... - alan m. kafton 12:34:19 02/21/07 (14)
- So how about.... - mkuller 12:51:43 02/21/07 (13)
- Stealing is stealing - nightdoggy 17:33:25 02/21/07 (7)
- Re: not stealing is not stealing - ray m 19:02:11 02/21/07 (6)
- Yeah but - nightdoggy 19:23:37 02/21/07 (5)
- Re: Your circumstances are completely different. - alan m. kafton 21:42:42 02/21/07 (4)
- I can only imagine your response - nightdoggy 16:06:03 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: Really?? - alan m. kafton 17:44:55 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: Your circumstances are completely different. - tullman 15:34:18 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: Your circumstances are completely different. - alan m. kafton 17:43:30 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: So how about.... - alan m. kafton 13:02:11 02/21/07 (4)
- Re: So how about.... - ray m 04:40:57 02/22/07 (3)
- "Cables... can only have a negative effect on the signal." Huh? - clarkjohnsen 09:28:01 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: " In the case of AC cords, the "signal" properly speaking does not pass through them". Dhuh. - ray m 17:29:49 02/22/07 (0)
- But if the cables are being used as tone controls ... - Dave Pogue 04:45:04 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: In the famous words of Sylvester Stallone.... - alan m. kafton 11:13:53 02/21/07 (5)
- Is the purpose of this forum just to ask questions to reviewers/editors and.... - Rick W 11:46:56 02/21/07 (1)
- Re: Why must everything be black or white?? - alan m. kafton 12:29:56 02/21/07 (0)
- "Obviously the cable manufacturers feel differently. It ain't your call." - bjh 11:32:39 02/21/07 (2)
- Re: It must be.... - alan m. kafton 11:38:11 02/21/07 (1)
- Hold up! - bjh 11:43:47 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: DUT Return Policy - John Atkinson 04:14:14 02/21/07 (20)
- Why do you visit here? - nightdoggy 14:49:52 02/21/07 (12)
- Re: Why do you visit here? - John Atkinson 04:12:42 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: Why do you visit here? - regmac 13:37:48 02/23/07 (0)
- Re: Why do you visit here? - TomLarson 20:25:05 02/21/07 (4)
- Out of line - nightdoggy 09:24:09 02/22/07 (3)
- Don't Sweat It - John Atkinson 04:06:07 02/23/07 (2)
- Re: What kind of brolly, John? - alan m. kafton 16:51:38 02/23/07 (0)
- I'm such a jerk sometimes - nightdoggy 15:03:54 02/23/07 (0)
- Make that two disagrees. -t - Bruce Kendall 15:50:44 02/21/07 (0)
- Disagree - lancelot 15:42:00 02/21/07 (3)
- JA responds when it is convenient for him to do so - nightdoggy 16:00:30 02/21/07 (2)
- Re: JA responds because he's a stand-up guy.... - alan m. kafton 22:49:39 02/21/07 (0)
- Out of the clear blue sky and for no reason at all, I suppose. -t - Bruce Kendall 16:13:26 02/21/07 (0)
- If the review period is long over and the reviewer does not..... - Rick W 10:27:37 02/21/07 (0)
- Regarding your comment of it being... - bjh 06:59:23 02/21/07 (2)
- Re: Regarding your comment of it being... - John Atkinson 07:44:38 02/21/07 (1)
- I have made it abundantly clear that my concern - bjh 10:12:06 02/21/07 (0)
- A clarification - John Atkinson 04:25:01 02/21/07 (2)
- Does one require permission to return a test unit to a manufacturer? - bjh 07:12:24 02/21/07 (1)
- Who cares in this particular example????? - TomLarson 20:42:27 02/21/07 (0)
- Curiosity Killed The Cat... - bjh 20:41:30 02/20/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- no, he's a past reviewer for tas - hifitommy 19:10:27 02/21/07 (1)
- I get it (nt) - nightdoggy 19:15:21 02/21/07 (0)