|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: DUT Return Policy posted by bjh on February 20, 2007 at 17:45:36:
> Again, I see no fundamental reason for special treatment of cables.Why not? Cables, pebbles in jars, clever clocks and the like are, as you know, in the category of products which the more technically educated will claim do nothing audible under normal conditions. All started appearing in the mainstream after the end of the hi-fi boom and shortly after mainstream magazines switched to using reviews without controls. All these products have effectively zero technical R&D costs (but not necessarily marketing R&D) and high margins. Marketing would appear to be everything for these products and it would strike me as odd if they were not treated differently to the types of products for which Stereophile typically provides supporting measurements.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: DUT Return Policy - andy19191 12:11:53 02/21/07 (5)
- Oh, Mr. audiophile expert... - mkuller 12:55:40 02/21/07 (4)
- Re: Oh, Mr. audiophile expert... - andy19191 01:18:49 02/22/07 (0)
- What are you, the AA police? - nightdoggy 17:23:43 02/21/07 (2)
- no, he's a past reviewer for tas - hifitommy 19:10:27 02/21/07 (1)
- I get it (nt) - nightdoggy 19:15:21 02/21/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
