I don't know that his test method is appropriate for a dipole speaker that is a line source, I think some changes in protocol would need to made from his normal procedure which works well for box speakers but a panel speaker is a rather different animal.
Some useful info comes from the test- but I think overall the test method needs to be redesigned when used with a line source dipole. I don't know what, exactly, should be changed but clearly his results are not consistent with what people hear from the LRS. His method uses math to derive an anechoic response from the many many measurements made by his Klippel measurement robot, but I don't think anechoic response tells you much about a speaker that interacts so with the listening space the way a dipole does.
Science doesn't care what you believe.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - triamp 03:52:42 09/25/20 (40)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - dinhcamnhung73@gmail.com 20:17:23 10/16/20 (0)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - Dawnrazor 19:47:00 10/08/20 (0)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - gadio4533 07:47:49 10/01/20 (0)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - Reedo 14:12:15 09/30/20 (1)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - MarcL 15:58:28 09/30/20 (0)
- The review was absurd - josh358 06:03:17 09/28/20 (11)
- measurement technology on planars - DrChaos 19:09:59 09/30/20 (1)
- RE: measurement technology on planars - josh358 18:33:59 10/13/20 (0)
- RE: The review was absurd - timm 18:51:48 09/30/20 (2)
- RE: The review was absurd - shumi 09:48:08 10/02/20 (1)
- RE: The review was absurd - josh358 18:33:28 10/13/20 (0)
- RE: The review was absurd - sbrook 09:08:02 09/28/20 (3)
- RE: The review was absurd - josh358 18:38:00 10/13/20 (0)
- RE: The review was absurd - BDP24 12:17:32 10/01/20 (1)
- RE: The review was absurd - sbrook 12:47:16 10/01/20 (0)
- RE: The review was absurd - Davey 08:12:23 09/28/20 (1)
- +1 (NT) - josh358 18:40:11 10/13/20 (0)
- tell them to put all that equipment in the closet and throw on 'Trane's "Slo Blues" - Green Lantern 14:38:08 09/27/20 (0)
- I learned something years ago - Story 03:18:47 09/27/20 (3)
- RE: I learned something years ago - triamp 04:35:54 09/27/20 (2)
- RE: I learned something years ago - timm 20:01:27 09/27/20 (0)
- RE: I learned something years ago - Story 04:58:06 09/27/20 (0)
- Not everything that counts can be counted, and...- - MWE 20:48:17 09/25/20 (1)
- RE: Not everything that counts can be counted, and...- - rivervalley817 21:05:18 09/25/20 (0)
- it's obvious everyone on that forum loves this - Green Lantern 19:46:20 09/25/20 (0)
- Objectivists must have very dull and boring lives... - Tromatic 13:03:20 09/25/20 (1)
- RE: Objectivists must have very dull and boring lives... - monkuboy 15:27:15 09/25/20 (0)
- "This is not a product finished and fit for use by a consumer." - Jon L 11:47:51 09/25/20 (4)
- RE: "This is not a product finished and fit for use by a consumer." - monkuboy 12:29:32 09/25/20 (3)
- RE: "This is not a product finished and fit for use by a consumer." - Utley1 20:33:14 09/25/20 (0)
- Pendulum must swing - Jon L 20:26:09 09/25/20 (0)
- Agree - grantv 12:35:00 09/25/20 (0)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - Davey 10:08:01 09/25/20 (1)
- That is rule number one to win at social media - farfetched 17:13:33 09/25/20 (0)
- ASR: Home of the 1 speaker imaging - emailtim 08:39:42 09/25/20 (0)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - Aspheric 05:17:33 09/25/20 (3)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - Mcmusicman 15:38:05 10/09/20 (0)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - triamp 04:24:20 09/27/20 (0)
- RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website - FX35 12:34:25 09/25/20 (0)
- How did I know the review was negative before I read it - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 05:05:53 09/25/20 (0)