In Reply to: AudioKinesis SWARM: The Ideal Sub System? posted by Mike Currie on March 15, 2009 at 15:12:30:
Could be. You've got the v2 and I've got the v1 iteration. I sold my VMPS Larger Sub-woofer and never looked back. Not only is the bass tighter and deeper, it does eliminate the bass nodes. I read about all the folks spending little to large bucks on traps that don't look so good for the most part and I wonder, isn't the SWARM a better solution? Prolly.
Can't wait to hear it, Mike.
"If people don't want to come, nothing will stop them" - Sol Hurok
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: AudioKinesis SWARM: The Ideal Sub System? - Travis 16:17:29 03/15/09 (10)
- RE: My SWARM (pic) - Travis 14:36:05 03/16/09 (0)
- RE: AudioKinesis SWARM: The Ideal Sub System? - Brian Bennett 07:48:02 03/16/09 (8)
- RE: The Concept is Very Valid - Greg Ewing 16:44:03 03/26/09 (0)
- RE: AudioKinesis SWARM: The Ideal Sub System? - Joe Schmo 11:37:27 03/16/09 (6)
- RE: AudioKinesis SWARM: The Ideal Sub System? - triamp 01:53:58 03/22/09 (5)
- My understanding of planar transient behavior in the bass region is a bit different - Duke 22:34:58 03/24/09 (0)
- RE: AudioKinesis SWARM: The Ideal Sub System? - IanLane 19:41:41 03/24/09 (3)
- RE: AudioKinesis SWARM: The Ideal Sub System? - Duke 22:06:51 03/24/09 (2)
- RE: AudioKinesis SWARM: The Ideal Sub System? - IanLane 23:36:26 03/25/09 (1)
- RE: AudioKinesis SWARM: The Ideal Sub System? - Duke 00:52:49 03/26/09 (0)