In Reply to: Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! posted by Arbelos on February 5, 2001 at 06:13:30:
thanks Arbelos!i'm very nervous, just home and all the time from the system
to the computer, then back again, trying to understand what
is going on with the buzz and with the very unusual kind of
improvement which has took place after the line xo thingi'll reverse the connections on the line networks for them
to be placed very close to the amps, then i'll post back, but
in the meantime: is there any DANGER with my present setup?
the buzz is not annoying, but i'd like to make sure it's not
dangerous either!Klemperer's 3rd: recorded STEREO in 1959 with the Philarmonia Orq.,
Abbey Road Studios; dig remast 1990 by EMI (CDM 7 63356 2);
this is one my desert island recordings too, and i always use
it to test everything: it's not the quality of the sound which
matters here, but if the thing to be tested is able to convey
the tension/emotion which i know there is on it!!best, paco
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - paco 06:32:30 02/05/01 (3)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - Arbelos 06:56:46 02/05/01 (2)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - pco 09:32:17 02/05/01 (1)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - Double Trouble 15:52:42 02/05/01 (0)