In Reply to: Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! posted by CH Chang on February 4, 2001 at 17:04:36:
This is it. Paco used a couple of resistors instead of the pot.http://indy.kpt.arl.psu.edu/daver/passive line level crossover.htm
Davey.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - Davey 18:02:44 02/04/01 (19)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - CH Chang 15:42:33 02/05/01 (7)
- resistor calculation - MikeCh 16:27:31 02/05/01 (3)
- Re: resistor calculation - CH Chang 22:07:34 02/05/01 (2)
- Re: resistor calculation - davey 10:16:49 02/06/01 (1)
- Thanks! (nt) - CH Chang 20:50:16 02/06/01 (0)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - MikeCh 15:50:46 02/05/01 (1)
- Re: Thanks, that's what I thought. (nt) - CH Chang 16:16:40 02/05/01 (0)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - paco 18:29:15 02/04/01 (10)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - davey 10:12:50 02/05/01 (0)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - Davey 18:53:44 02/04/01 (1)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - paco 06:13:33 02/05/01 (0)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - Arbelos 18:51:11 02/04/01 (6)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - paco 04:32:12 02/05/01 (5)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - Arbelos 06:13:30 02/05/01 (4)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - paco 06:32:30 02/05/01 (3)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - Arbelos 06:56:46 02/05/01 (2)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - pco 09:32:17 02/05/01 (1)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - Double Trouble 15:52:42 02/05/01 (0)