RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Blind test and quantum physics - jonny.cornthwaite@gmail.com 08:31:44 10/10/23 (106)

Open baffle works best with headphones - Freo-1 08:28:27 10/23/23 (1)

RE: Open baffle works best with headphones - peppy m. 17:38:25 10/30/23 (0)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - dericmc@live.com 18:00:09 10/22/23 (0)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - Jonnycorn3 13:23:26 10/20/23 (0)

Become a sub-objectivist. - peppy m. 06:43:15 10/16/23 (1)

RE: Become a sub-objectivist. - Goober58 18:12:13 10/16/23 (0)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - tomservo 09:10:51 10/12/23 (65)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - Analog Scott 09:23:19 10/12/23 (64)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - tomservo 09:47:04 10/16/23 (63)

Just gotta make sure - E-Stat 14:37:47 10/17/23 (62)

The Big GOTCHA that folks seem to ignore with ABX, etc. - Jon Risch 21:00:28 10/21/23 (31)

Late response - Jon Risch 13:23:06 11/12/23 (0)

RE: The Big GOTCHA that folks seem to ignore with ABX, etc. - Tom Brennan 07:11:16 10/23/23 (28)

RE: The Big GOTCHA that folks seem to ignore with ABX, etc. - Jon Risch 16:39:29 11/12/23 (0)

Or the subjects? - Freo-1 08:00:30 10/23/23 (26)

RE: Or the subjects? - Analog Scott 08:55:36 10/23/23 (25)

No. The conditions are accurate. - Freo-1 09:56:51 10/23/23 (24)

No, you are trying to add unnecessary conditions to try to sabotage ABX - Analog Scott 11:35:04 10/23/23 (23)

Obfuscate, equivocate, hedge, muddle, dodge, stall. ~:) As I noted below... - regmac 07:08:47 10/24/23 (22)

"As you noted before" - Analog Scott 10:28:05 10/24/23 (0)

Sounds like BS dogma to me.. - Freo-1 08:42:26 10/24/23 (20)

RE: Sounds like BS dogma to me.. - Inmate51 12:33:23 10/24/23 (18)

RE: Sounds like BS dogma to me.. - Analog Scott 15:34:53 10/24/23 (6)

RE: Sounds like BS dogma to me.. - Tre' 06:20:05 10/25/23 (5)

RE: Sounds like BS dogma to me.. - Analog Scott 06:57:58 10/25/23 (4)

RE: Sounds like BS dogma to me.. - Tre' 09:56:40 10/25/23 (0)

RE: Sounds like BS dogma to me.. - Inmate51 08:55:38 10/25/23 (1)

RE: Sounds like BS dogma to me.. - Analog Scott 09:51:26 10/25/23 (0)

" The "triode" distortion is heavy on 2nd order but also adds other harmonics at lower levels " - Story 08:36:52 10/25/23 (0)

Fair points. - Freo-1 14:22:36 10/24/23 (10)

RE: Fair points. - Analog Scott 15:41:52 10/24/23 (9)

RE: Fair points. - Freo-1 16:57:42 10/24/23 (8)

RE: Fair points. - Analog Scott 17:25:37 10/24/23 (7)

RE: Fair points. - Freo-1 09:05:22 10/25/23 (6)

RE: Fair points. - Analog Scott 10:12:01 10/25/23 (4)

The Chord DAC's are more transparent than off the shelf DACs. - Freo-1 10:23:26 10/25/23 (3)

RE: The Chord DAC's are more transparent than off the shelf DACs. - Analog Scott 10:44:05 10/25/23 (2)

Your missing the big flick - Freo-1 15:04:12 10/27/23 (1)

RE: Your missing the big flick - Analog Scott 21:16:12 10/27/23 (0)

RE: Fair points. - Inmate51 09:24:28 10/25/23 (0)

RE: Sounds like BS dogma to me.. - Analog Scott 10:09:40 10/24/23 (0)

RE: The Big GOTCHA that folks seem to ignore with ABX, etc. - Analog Scott 08:09:05 10/22/23 (0)

RE: Just gotta make sure - tomservo 13:53:32 10/18/23 (1)

Differences do exist -nt - E-Stat 14:11:39 10/18/23 (0)

"All the box did was combine the feedback loops of both amps!" - Tre' 20:08:46 10/17/23 (21)

Why ask me? - E-Stat 05:39:52 10/18/23 (20)

RE: Why ask me? - Tre' 17:30:24 10/18/23 (16)

It probably helps to look at what Van Alstine actually said - Analog Scott 19:09:27 10/18/23 (6)

RE: It probably helps to look at what Van Alstine actually said - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 20:42:21 10/18/23 (2)

A good, on point response. Thank you. nt - Tre' 14:46:27 10/19/23 (0)

RE: It probably helps to look at what Van Alstine actually said - Analog Scott 20:55:16 10/18/23 (0)

I did - Tre' 19:31:12 10/18/23 (2)

RE: I did - Analog Scott 20:50:57 10/18/23 (1)

RE: I did - Tre' 14:34:26 10/19/23 (0)

RE: Why ask me? - E-Stat 18:18:22 10/18/23 (8)

RE: Why ask me? - Tre' 14:41:59 10/19/23 (6)

Because I have no reason to believe - E-Stat 14:50:34 10/19/23 (5)

Not lying, just wrong. nt - Tre' 14:57:09 10/19/23 (4)

Never found that to be the case - E-Stat 15:06:19 10/19/23 (3)

so there are measurements supporting the assertion? - Analog Scott 15:32:39 10/19/23 (2)

Return to his original comments - E-Stat 15:34:57 10/19/23 (1)

RE: Return to his original comments - Analog Scott 16:02:27 10/19/23 (0)

RE: Why ask me? - Analog Scott 18:59:24 10/18/23 (0)

I asked him - Analog Scott 08:17:52 10/18/23 (2)

And he responded - Analog Scott 08:43:53 10/18/23 (0)

Good deal - E-Stat 08:28:52 10/18/23 (0)

RE: Just gotta make sure - Analog Scott 17:51:49 10/17/23 (5)

Methinks you're on a fool's errand... - regmac 14:00:56 10/20/23 (4)

RE: Methinks you're on a fool's errand... - Analog Scott 10:52:49 10/22/23 (0)

RE: Methinks you're on a fool's errand... - Jonnycorn3 14:58:44 10/21/23 (2)

RE: Methinks you're on a fool's errand... - Analog Scott 10:54:28 10/22/23 (1)

RE: Methinks you're on a fool's errand... - Jonnycorn3 15:23:32 10/22/23 (0)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - regmac 13:00:40 10/11/23 (9)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - Jonnycorn3 10:52:39 10/13/23 (8)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - Analog Scott 16:04:29 10/13/23 (7)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - Jonnycorn3 13:37:46 10/20/23 (6)

quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Analog Scott 11:19:28 10/22/23 (5)

RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Jonnycorn3 17:33:43 10/22/23 (3)

RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Jonnycorn3 17:38:15 10/22/23 (2)

RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Jonnycorn3 18:00:57 10/22/23 (0)

RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Jonnycorn3 17:44:58 10/22/23 (0)

RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Jonnycorn3 15:31:00 10/22/23 (0)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - Goober58 09:29:32 10/11/23 (3)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - Analog Scott 11:03:51 10/11/23 (2)

Actually... - E-Stat 14:21:51 10/11/23 (0)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - Goober58 11:59:04 10/11/23 (0)

Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 10:38:56 10/10/23 (17)

RE: Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - double28 12:57:34 10/10/23 (15)

RE: Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - jonny.cornthwaite@gmail.com 17:02:22 10/10/23 (14)

RE: Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - Analog Scott 17:46:49 10/10/23 (13)

RE: Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - tomservo 10:55:20 10/14/23 (0)

RE: Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - Jonnycorn3 04:38:00 10/11/23 (5)

RE: Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - Analog Scott 09:07:31 10/11/23 (3)

RE: Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - fredtr 07:04:58 10/12/23 (2)

" I had an experience finding water running through a buried PVC pipe with a divining rod." - Tre' 17:08:21 10/15/23 (1)

RE: " I had an experience finding water running through a buried PVC pipe with a divining rod." - fredtr 07:30:35 10/16/23 (0)

RE: Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - AudioKnob 05:39:14 10/11/23 (0)

Whoa, what a great answer. We have a real physicist on AA! (nt) - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 19:52:05 10/10/23 (5)

+1 - Chris from Lafayette 00:49:20 10/11/23 (4)

RE: +1 - Analog Scott 08:07:58 10/11/23 (3)

LOL! I guess that's the way it is with consultants! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 11:29:26 10/11/23 (2)

Depends on your status - Analog Scott 11:43:35 10/11/23 (1)

Science portrayal in Hollywood - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 13:20:02 10/11/23 (0)

RE: Quantum mechanics, Newtonian dynamics and human psychology - Analog Scott 11:10:55 10/10/23 (0)

Blind tests are merely reality checks - Analog Scott 09:54:05 10/10/23 (0)

RE: Blind test and quantum physics - Inmate51 08:44:48 10/10/23 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Jonnycorn3 17:33:43 10/22/23 (3)

RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Jonnycorn3 17:38:15 10/22/23 (2)

RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Jonnycorn3 18:00:57 10/22/23 (0)

RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism - Jonnycorn3 17:44:58 10/22/23 (0)

Post a Message!