![]() |
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: RE: You don't understand specs very well. posted by 3db on September 28, 2012 at 20:52:56:
One feature I DO like on some HT receivers is the ability to Biamp. Depending on the speakers crossover frequency this can be a very useful feature. Speakers permitting, of course.
My panels can benefit from such treatment.
Too much is never enough
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - bizmord@optonline.net 10:05:29 09/21/12 (77)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Lizard84 07:04:03 09/29/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - pictureguy 23:25:09 09/27/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - russ69 18:15:24 09/26/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - pictureguy 22:31:07 09/26/12 (0)
- Not controversial, or it shouldn't be - Goober58 09:58:22 09/25/12 (1)
- RE: Not controversial, or it shouldn't be - pictureguy 13:50:20 09/25/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - pictureguy 13:54:17 09/24/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Bromo33333 17:21:29 09/24/12 (0)
- Maybe, because you have a lot of loudspeakers attached to it?? - jedrider 13:19:29 09/24/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - pictureguy 11:36:38 09/23/12 (22)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - 3db 10:19:32 09/25/12 (0)
- That would be - unclestu 12:55:53 09/24/12 (18)
- RE: That would be - pictureguy 13:32:26 09/24/12 (17)
- RE: That would be - 3db 10:23:20 09/25/12 (16)
- RE: That would be - pictureguy 22:42:32 09/26/12 (15)
- You don't understand specs very well. - 3db 09:23:42 09/27/12 (14)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - pictureguy 18:12:32 09/27/12 (4)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - 3db 05:13:36 09/28/12 (0)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - ionman 21:22:30 09/27/12 (2)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - 3db 05:07:17 09/28/12 (0)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - pictureguy 23:14:54 09/27/12 (0)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - pictureguy 13:41:18 09/27/12 (8)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - 3db 05:25:55 09/28/12 (7)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - pictureguy 14:39:15 09/28/12 (6)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - 3db 20:52:56 09/28/12 (5)
- One Feature: - pictureguy 23:53:30 09/29/12 (0)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - pictureguy 23:45:45 09/29/12 (3)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - 3db 17:26:55 09/30/12 (2)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - pictureguy 20:30:08 09/30/12 (1)
- RE: You don't understand specs very well. - 3db 04:43:00 10/01/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Bizmord 15:42:37 09/23/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - pictureguy 18:56:26 09/23/12 (0)
- Sounds right. Got to spend over $5000 for a good Quarterback, though. nt - tinear 10:21:18 09/23/12 (1)
- RE: Sounds right. Got to spend over $5000 for a good Quarterback, though. nt - pictureguy 13:51:31 09/25/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Mechans 06:06:04 09/23/12 (0)
- different factors involved..I mean we 'are' talking about 3 to 4 different components crammed together - Green Lantern 03:06:03 09/23/12 (1)
- RE: different factors involved..I mean we 'are' talking about 3 to 4 different components crammed together - pictureguy 11:25:59 09/26/12 (0)
- Beefier sound. Better bass. Stick with Yamaha nt - bjh 17:19:25 09/22/12 (0)
- One ear(s) does not a consensus make...n/t - JoeKool 21:13:42 09/21/12 (2)
- RE: One ear(s) does not a consensus make...n/t - Pianist718 23:31:44 09/21/12 (1)
- RE: One ear(s) does not a consensus make...n/t - jsm71 06:50:28 09/22/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - RGA 19:19:24 09/21/12 (8)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - pictureguy 13:44:36 09/24/12 (2)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - RGA 17:19:26 09/24/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - pictureguy 11:37:26 09/25/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Inmate51 11:18:39 09/22/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - RGA 04:50:27 09/23/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Pianist718 20:45:25 09/21/12 (2)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - RGA 05:16:58 09/23/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - pictureguy 13:56:33 09/25/12 (0)
- Controversial for those uniterested in sound quality - Stale 19:06:10 09/21/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial for those uniterested in sound quality - Hi-Fi Nut 04:11:13 09/22/12 (0)
- There is no controversy ... - reelsmith. 15:11:51 09/21/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - jsm71 13:19:15 09/21/12 (3)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - pictureguy 13:59:00 09/25/12 (2)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - bizmord@optonline.net 14:33:31 09/25/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - maximum kahuna 20:00:03 09/25/12 (0)
- It's Only "Controversial"............. - Todd Krieger 12:50:30 09/21/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Presto 12:38:49 09/21/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend - unclestu 12:29:59 09/21/12 (3)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend - Presto 12:41:12 09/21/12 (2)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend - unclestu 15:04:18 09/21/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend - Presto 15:43:52 09/21/12 (0)
- If it is Calvin Johnson, I would say go for it. - Chris O 12:10:05 09/21/12 (4)
- RE: If it is Calvin Johnson, I would say go for it. - Todd Krieger 13:15:13 09/21/12 (3)
- He does not - jec01 14:00:44 09/21/12 (2)
- It Took Me Two Days to Get It................... - Todd Krieger 20:23:27 09/22/12 (1)
- RE: It Took Me Two Days to Get It................... - esande 03:09:17 09/23/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Bromo33333 11:35:30 09/21/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - roscoeiii 10:55:47 09/21/12 (0)
- I would say... - mkuller 10:52:07 09/21/12 (0)
- If you do not hear a difference which matters, then absolutely no reason to buy a better receiver. period. - Elizabeth 10:47:43 09/21/12 (2)
- +2 - Bromo33333 07:15:14 09/24/12 (0)
- Right on, are you not happy with your sound, or do you just won't comments? NT - jnr 10:55:52 09/21/12 (0)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Stephæn 10:42:19 09/21/12 (1)
- RE: Controversial. Why spend $1,500+ on a Receiver? - Hi-Fi Nut 04:09:10 09/22/12 (0)
- "every time I ask this question I get mixed answers." - rlindsa 10:16:34 09/21/12 (0)
Follow Ups
- One Feature: - pictureguy 23:53:30 09/29/12 (0)