Propeller Head Plaza

Posted by Todd Krieger (A) on September 12, 2007 at 01:06:08

In Reply to: RE: Perhaps you all might agree with the conclusion more? posted by Axon on September 11, 2007 at 21:49:26

The root criticism is that a study was seemingly brought up out of thin air with a desired outcome, and then used as factual basis for the remaining article. (It also used subjective perception of just a few people, that is not unanimously agreed with, as factual basis.) The lack of references, controls, or data raised skepticism over whether such a project had actually taken place. Citing the seemingly-sacred belief that because it's an AES article, it's automatically truth and ought not be challenged.

• "a study was seemingly brought up out of thin air with a desired outcome" - andy_c 20:16:25 09/12/07 (0)
• "The... sacred belief that because it's an AES article, it's automatically truth and ought not be challenged." - clarkjohnsen 09:35:51 09/12/07 (5)
  • From the book of Positive Feedback, chapter 8, verse 5. And the Lord CJ cast the devil from the redbook cd - AJinFLA 13:41:59 09/13/07 (0)
  • These Were Never True Peer Reviews to Begin With....... - Todd Krieger 11:07:02 09/12/07 (3)
    • Excellent post - Analog Scott 08:32:28 09/13/07 (0)
    • "Token peers," Omigosh, that sez it all! - clarkjohnsen 11:11:18 09/12/07 (1)
      • That's not sour grapes talking, is it? - tlyyra 09:54:11 09/14/07 (0)

Post a Followup:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Propeller Head Plaza ]
[ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2007, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---