Propeller Head Plaza

Convenient assumption

206.255.203.68

In Reply to: RE: No contradiction, but I may have confused you posted by Axon on September 13, 2007 at 21:50:45

...but that the difference is *entirely* explained by improved mastering practices for high res releases.

Explained...how?

rw

Follow Ups:

you got me. I need to retake logic 101. Round 3: - Axon 08:14:16 09/14/07 (50)
- With any kind of test - E-Stat 08:36:48 09/14/07 (49)
  - you're really struggling here - truthseekerprime 07:01:48 09/16/07 (48)
    - "Demonstrated that FOR THE SAME RECORDING reducing the resolution did not have an audible effect." NO! - clarkjohnsen 10:49:26 09/17/07 (34)
      - RE: That clears up a lot! - EBradMeyer 21:24:25 09/21/07 (33)
        
        "A CD would have sounded the same." Good to know, but bland assertions are not proof. Besides... - clarkjohnsen 08:42:46 09/22/07 (32)
        
        RE: "Memory Player that produces a sonic result superior to any other" - tlyyra 08:49:21 09/24/07 (0)
        
        RE: That clears up a lot! - EBradMeyer 07:01:54 09/23/07 (19)
        
        "I give you The Church of the Latter Day Saints." So that's what it's going to be, is it? - clarkjohnsen 08:54:32 09/24/07 (18)
        
        RE: "I give you The Church of the Latter Day Saints." So that's what it's going to be, is it? - EBradMeyer 14:18:08 09/24/07 (1)
        
        "The device we were using is a recording system, which passes a signal *through* it." Oh. - clarkjohnsen 10:13:34 09/25/07 (0)
        
        RE: "I give you The Church of the Latter Day Saints." So that's what it's going to be, is it? - EBradMeyer 13:53:30 09/24/07 (15)
        
        "It's not up to me to prove reviewers can't hear the huge differences." LOL! You made the assertion... - clarkjohnsen 09:59:20 09/25/07 (8)
        
        Still bullshitting? - tlyyra 10:21:25 09/26/07 (2)
        
        I be happy you continue to delude yourself. Couldn't happen to a more appropriate guy. - clarkjohnsen 11:22:48 09/28/07 (1)
        
        Done that - tlyyra 10:05:26 09/29/07 (0)
        
        RE: "It's not up to me, etc." - EBradMeyer 11:28:48 09/25/07 (4)
        
        "They're... way to risky for you." Oh geez, puh-leeze. - clarkjohnsen 09:16:22 09/26/07 (0)
        
        You're correct - it has been demonstrated. Don't bother arguing with him; it's an utter waste of time. /nt - truthseekerprime 20:01:22 09/25/07 (2)
        
        "It has been demonstrated" all right... that it's "a crock". That's if you pay any attention to... - clarkjohnsen 09:24:08 09/26/07 (0)
        
        RE: You're correct etc. - EBradMeyer 07:32:26 09/26/07 (0)
        
        Complettely OT - ABXing absolute polarity - Axon 22:32:57 09/24/07 (5)
        
        RE: Complettely OT - ABXing absolute polarity - EBradMeyer 01:33:16 09/25/07 (4)
        
        You underestimate the thickness of my skull - Axon 05:52:32 09/25/07 (3)
        
        RE: You underestimate the thickness of my skull - EBradMeyer 11:33:53 09/25/07 (2)
        
        No pain, no gain! - Axon 16:54:20 09/26/07 (1)
        
        RE: No pain, no gain! - EBradMeyer 07:40:47 09/27/07 (0)
        
        RE: "A CD would have sounded the same." Good to know, but bland assertions are not proof. Besides... - krabapple 16:24:39 09/22/07 (1)
        
        AA posts as "uncontradicted evidence" - tlyyra 03:30:22 09/23/07 (0)
        
        You're right Clark, but that's not the point. - rick_m 12:34:04 09/22/07 (8)
        
        Thank you. But even "going astray", while that does happen, is not the core of my argument. - clarkjohnsen 11:09:23 09/23/07 (7)
        
        RE: Thank you. But even "going astray", while that does happen, is not the core of my argument. - rick_m 13:09:12 09/23/07 (6)
        
        "They have eliminated [CD playback] as a variable," True; but then they try to tell us... - clarkjohnsen 08:26:14 09/24/07 (5)
        
        Having now read it... - rick_m 09:07:04 09/25/07 (1)
        
        "I wasn't missing much." Indeed not. Yet I got challenged for calling it a quick read! nt - clarkjohnsen 10:02:59 09/25/07 (0)
        
        OK,Ok,ok - rick_m 09:14:13 09/24/07 (2)
        
        This URL may get you to it. - clarkjohnsen 09:33:57 09/24/07 (1)
        
        Excellent, thanks! nt - rick_m 09:46:55 09/24/07 (0)
    - Struggling for what? - E-Stat 09:11:00 09/16/07 (12)
      - (See my post above.) nt - clarkjohnsen 10:50:12 09/17/07 (0)
      - I guess basic reading comprehension - truthseekerprime 13:19:50 09/16/07 (10)
        
        So, professor - E-Stat 17:56:52 09/16/07 (9)
        
        "Our test results indicate that all of these recordings could be released on conventional CDs... - truthseekerprime 20:28:50 09/16/07 (8)
        
        Anecdotally, I think it may be true. - rick_m 10:17:47 09/20/07 (0)
        
        As have I - E-Stat 21:23:00 09/16/07 (6)
        
        RE: As have I - krabapple 09:43:44 09/20/07 (5)
        
        The common term for your explanation - E-Stat 09:56:29 09/20/07 (4)
        
        RE: The common term for your explanation - krabapple 16:19:26 09/22/07 (1)
        
        There is a difference - E-Stat 09:01:51 09/23/07 (0)
        
        A whole lot o' speculatin' goin' on in the paper too. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:05:42 09/22/07 (1)
        
        In stark contrast to your pamphlet that was so convincingly argued that you had to pay for it to get printed? - tlyyra 03:33:55 09/23/07 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.