In Reply to: John Marks is in the cable business! posted by 13th Duke of Wymbourne on April 20, 2016 at 20:06:54:
Hi-
Thanks, I guess, for the notice.
I have been a loudspeaker design nerd since about 1966, and when I was hired to be the founding contributing editor and columnist for DIGITAL AUDIO magazine (IIRC 1982), I was both fascinated and horrified to learn that the only practical digital recording system was based upon its ability to use Sony's installed base of professional broadcast U-matic ANALOG television video-cassette recorders that had been designed to work with both 50Hz and 60Hz wall-current based video-scan formats.
Hunh? I thought this was a Brave New World?
So I then looked into things and realized that the reason Sony's standard prevailed (and Soundstream's failed) was that any radio/TV broadcaster, fr'instance in the EC, who had an installed base of the bog-standard Sony U-matic ANALOG video recorders had more than half of what they needed to record S/PDIF digital audio.
Indeed, back in the day, UHF Channel 44 in the Boston area, late at night, used to broadcast Boston Symphony live digital recordings over the air, as video programs one could record to a VHS cassette, and with the proper mod/demod, get digital audio. Criminy!
So then I went (compressing decades in slow motion) to puzzling about the 75-Ohm RCA roots of S/PDIF in analog television, to the origins of coaxial cable in the efforts to keep transatlantic telegraphic cables from blowing up under the strain of mutually-induced currents in the opposite polarity, to Oliver Heaviside's single-handed, pure-math based, invention of coaxial cable (1880).
Heaviside's invention--largely unheralded, because he was a self-taught peasant--was in effect (despite the facts that he had to co-invent vector analysis and independently invent an operational calculus that was functionally equivalent to Laplace transforms, that I had tried to get my mind around in prep school, but totally failed) was to enclose a solid-core DC conductor in a tubular Faraday Cage 2,000 miles long...
So, the Humility part is that I am not fit to tie Oliver Heaviside's shoes, and that I have never spent a moment thinking that I was smarter than the guys who made "PCM over S/PDIF" work.
Where was I?
Oh. Years ago, despairing of being able to afford a digital cable I loved, I did some half-assed design work (Charley Hanson says my math was unimpeachable, but that every one of my premises was faulty, yet: we remain friends) and I had made some prototypes.
So, when I escaped from Ceausescu's Romania in a hot-air balloon made out of rubber raincoats (kidding!), I ended up in the Peoples' Democratic Republic of Rhode Island, and I refined the prototypes, and I was thinking, I'd make a few cables for friends, but, a couple/few heavy hitters heard the most recent prototype and said, "Hey, Johnny Puddles, this here is your ticket out of the Federal Witness Protection Program," and I fell for that.
But at the last minute I panicked, and I made a couple of modifications.
So, not having heard the modifications, when the bill came due on the first production batch, I literally prayed, "Please let these not sound worse than the last prototype." When I heard a randomly-selected cable from the first batch, I had to wipe away tears of relief. I had dreaded having to give them away to Goodwill and write it all off.
I will never claim that I had made the best anything. But I really feel that if I was a consumer, this is a cable I'd be willing to buy.
I hope this provides the background. I never for a moment thought that I had a "name" to cash in on. I am just rather obsessive about "Material Culture and Technology," which is what I got my undergraduate degree in, and the curious history of cable design and of digital audio have always been of interest. E.g., PCM was invented in the 1930s as a way to increase the carrying capacity of transatlantic cables beyond their purely electrical capacity, by multiplexing... But, I obsess.
ATB,
John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Humility and Prayer - John Marks 20:57:26 04/20/16 (46)
- RE: Humility and Prayer - thetubeguy1954 14:33:08 04/30/16 (1)
- Thanks! nt - John Marks 17:12:32 05/01/16 (0)
- Wow...who resurrected Douglas Adams? - MannyE 11:32:58 04/30/16 (19)
- Naah, I come "TO SERVE MAN." - John Marks 17:13:38 05/01/16 (18)
- So.... it's a cookbook? - MannyE 10:53:51 05/04/16 (17)
- TUESDAY IS SOYLENT BLUE DAY... NT - John Marks 15:04:25 05/04/16 (16)
- RE: TUESDAY IS SOYLENT BLUE DAY... NT - fantja 09:32:25 05/08/16 (15)
- I have been selling cables for a couple of months, signing up dealers... - John Marks 07:35:17 05/09/16 (14)
- You know... even as a cable skeptic... - MannyE 17:36:09 05/14/16 (13)
- Thank you! The AES/EBU is very pretty too (Image) - John Marks 08:03:02 05/15/16 (12)
- RE: Thank you! The AES/EBU is very pretty too (Image) - fantja 18:07:55 05/15/16 (11)
- Analog signal cables, perhaps; speaker cables, I kind of doubt - John Marks 09:46:41 05/16/16 (10)
- RE: Analog signal cables, perhaps; speaker cables, I kind of doubt - fantja 12:05:40 05/16/16 (8)
- I have not heard many of the cables that are generally regarded as very good - John Marks 17:09:26 05/16/16 (7)
- RE: I have not heard many of the cables that are generally regarded as very good - A.Wayne 11:42:43 05/24/16 (3)
- Still am, but that's a DIY or custom-shop option NT - John Marks 10:19:55 05/26/16 (0)
- RE: I have not heard many of the cables that are generally regarded as very good - fantja 14:31:24 05/25/16 (1)
- RE: I have not heard many of the cables that are generally regarded as very good - A.Wayne 08:16:14 05/26/16 (0)
- RE: I have not heard many of the cables that are generally regarded as very good - fantja 17:14:51 05/16/16 (2)
- I don't think I can do that... - John Marks 07:38:36 05/17/16 (1)
- RE: I don't think I can do that... - fantja 09:10:56 05/17/16 (0)
- RE: Analog signal cables, perhaps; speaker cables, I kind of doubt - fantja 12:04:24 05/16/16 (0)
- The reply of "A Gentleman and a Scholar". nt - Smelly_Socks 22:16:15 04/20/16 (0)
- So bushell it is :) (nt) - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 21:20:19 04/20/16 (22)
- I'd bet on Charley Hanson's being right!!!! - John Marks 21:36:38 04/20/16 (21)
- RE: I'd bet on Charley Hanson's being right!!!! - Tony Lauck 13:29:50 04/21/16 (20)
- Here's my calculation, which is based on the word-clock rate (but I assumed 16 bits) - John Marks 18:06:12 04/21/16 (19)
- RE: Here's my calculation, which is based on the word-clock rate (but I assumed 16 bits) - fmak 22:00:22 04/22/16 (1)
- It's not the basis of the design--it was an INQUIRY (perhaps the wrong tree was barked up, so what) into why.. - John Marks 07:08:58 04/23/16 (0)
- RE: Here's my calculation, which is based on the word-clock rate (but I assumed 16 bits) - Dave_K 13:09:34 04/22/16 (2)
- I agree, it is the transitions that matter! - John Marks 13:22:28 04/22/16 (1)
- RE: I agree, it is the transitions that matter! - Dave_K 15:09:20 04/25/16 (0)
- RE: Here's my calculation, which is based on the word-clock rate (but I assumed 16 bits) - Tony Lauck 12:11:26 04/22/16 (13)
- Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - John Marks 13:25:57 04/22/16 (12)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Tony Lauck 09:13:38 04/23/16 (8)
- I think then we are using different terms for the same thing - John Marks 10:12:01 04/23/16 (3)
- RE: I think then we are using different terms for the same thing - Tony Lauck 10:35:22 04/23/16 (2)
- If as much money flowed into high end audio as flowed into military electronics - Dave_K 14:45:52 04/25/16 (0)
- Well, is not dCS a Military Avionics Prime Contractor??? NT - John Marks 10:57:56 04/23/16 (0)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Isaak J. Garvey 09:35:37 04/23/16 (3)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Dave_K 14:33:50 04/25/16 (0)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Tony Lauck 14:52:57 04/23/16 (1)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Isaak J. Garvey 15:07:22 04/23/16 (0)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:47:15 04/22/16 (2)
- I appreciate your support, but, I take Tony seriously! I am always willing to learn. - John Marks 19:14:31 04/22/16 (1)
- RE: I appreciate your support, but, I take Tony seriously! I am always willing to learn. - Isaak J. Garvey 20:35:33 04/22/16 (0)