|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Here's my calculation, which is based on the word-clock rate (but I assumed 16 bits) posted by Dave_K on April 22, 2016 at 13:09:34:
BTW, in a private email, John Atkinson quoted different numbers, and again in a private email, Charley Hansen quoted different numbers.
I have always said that my cable design is what it is, it sounds as it sounds, and whether it sounds good is despite my efforts rather than because of them doesn't matter if the customer is happy.
(I know competent engineers who claim that any properly working DAC can cope with minute timing errors and therefore cables cannot matter... .)
I have never claimed that my cable is "best." I think digital cables are rather system-specific. I think that my cable is a valid option and I am happy with its sound, at the price. I could (in theory) make a hugely expensive cable but at this point I have no idea whether it would sound better.
Anyway, it's "Countdown-to-Campari Time" here at Esperanto Audio's worldwide headquarters' executive suites.
Tee hee.
John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I agree, it is the transitions that matter! - John Marks 13:22:28 04/22/16 (1)
- RE: I agree, it is the transitions that matter! - Dave_K 15:09:20 04/25/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
