In Reply to: RE: I'd bet on Charley Hanson's being right!!!! posted by Tony Lauck on April 21, 2016 at 13:29:50:
Speed of light is represented by "c."
c = 1 foot per nanosecond
In one second, light travels 1 Billion feet (186,000 miles)
Given VPROP of .75c, in my cable, the electromagnetic flux travels 750,000,000 feet in one second.
To divide by fs of 44,100: 750000000/44,100
7,500,000/441
Solve to 17,006.8027
3.22 miles
A 3.5-inch difference is on the order of, 10 to -5 power.
???
JM
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Here's my calculation, which is based on the word-clock rate (but I assumed 16 bits) - John Marks 18:06:12 04/21/16 (19)
- RE: Here's my calculation, which is based on the word-clock rate (but I assumed 16 bits) - fmak 22:00:22 04/22/16 (1)
- It's not the basis of the design--it was an INQUIRY (perhaps the wrong tree was barked up, so what) into why.. - John Marks 07:08:58 04/23/16 (0)
- RE: Here's my calculation, which is based on the word-clock rate (but I assumed 16 bits) - Dave_K 13:09:34 04/22/16 (2)
- I agree, it is the transitions that matter! - John Marks 13:22:28 04/22/16 (1)
- RE: I agree, it is the transitions that matter! - Dave_K 15:09:20 04/25/16 (0)
- RE: Here's my calculation, which is based on the word-clock rate (but I assumed 16 bits) - Tony Lauck 12:11:26 04/22/16 (13)
- Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - John Marks 13:25:57 04/22/16 (12)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Tony Lauck 09:13:38 04/23/16 (8)
- I think then we are using different terms for the same thing - John Marks 10:12:01 04/23/16 (3)
- RE: I think then we are using different terms for the same thing - Tony Lauck 10:35:22 04/23/16 (2)
- If as much money flowed into high end audio as flowed into military electronics - Dave_K 14:45:52 04/25/16 (0)
- Well, is not dCS a Military Avionics Prime Contractor??? NT - John Marks 10:57:56 04/23/16 (0)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Isaak J. Garvey 09:35:37 04/23/16 (3)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Dave_K 14:33:50 04/25/16 (0)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Tony Lauck 14:52:57 04/23/16 (1)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Isaak J. Garvey 15:07:22 04/23/16 (0)
- RE: Thanks, but could you please elaborate on... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:47:15 04/22/16 (2)
- I appreciate your support, but, I take Tony seriously! I am always willing to learn. - John Marks 19:14:31 04/22/16 (1)
- RE: I appreciate your support, but, I take Tony seriously! I am always willing to learn. - Isaak J. Garvey 20:35:33 04/22/16 (0)