Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD

Topic - Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - dave789 22:41:02 07/04/12 (51)

Dr. Diamond's paper was in the reading list of an EE course at MIT - dave789 06:38:41 07/23/12 (0)

Try this at home... - mkuller 20:00:19 07/08/12 (5)

RE: Try this at home... - Tony Lauck 10:31:39 07/23/12 (0)

I have - gme109 17:57:21 07/10/12 (2)

RE: I have - Tony Lauck 09:43:56 07/11/12 (1)

"N.B. these are Wikipedia's terms, not mine." In Wiki we trust. lol NT - Poles Apart 10:37:39 07/12/12 (0)

RE: Try this at home... - dave789 03:35:50 07/09/12 (0)

correction and another question - dave789 21:34:06 07/05/12 (7)

Dr. D. has been doing this test for decades with doubtless a variety of players. NT - Poles Apart 14:57:52 07/06/12 (6)

RE: Dr. D. has been doing this test for decades with doubtless a variety of players. NT - dave789 18:28:54 07/06/12 (5)

That "AES paper" was blatantly flawed garbage. NT - Poles Apart 10:34:04 07/07/12 (4)

RE: That "AES paper" was blatantly flawed garbage. - mls-stl 08:00:54 07/08/12 (3)

See the 175 posts (alas soon to be more) - Tony Lauck 08:46:53 07/08/12 (2)

Thanks... - mls-stl 09:03:07 07/08/12 (1)

Well you asked... kinda soon to toss the ball out of bounds isn't it? NT - Poles Apart 20:37:57 07/08/12 (0)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - hahax@verizon.net 20:35:59 07/05/12 (4)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - digepix 11:14:51 07/08/12 (0)

If that's true, then... - Poles Apart 21:35:18 07/05/12 (2)

One answer - mls-stl 12:21:00 07/06/12 (1)

I was assuming a mutatis mutandis situation. NT - Poles Apart 14:59:42 07/06/12 (0)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - Dawnrazor 13:40:07 07/05/12 (9)

Compression had nothing to do with it. - Poles Apart 13:56:11 07/05/12 (8)

RE: Compression had nothing to do with it. - Dawnrazor 08:14:48 07/06/12 (1)

Don't know for sure, but... - Poles Apart 10:40:20 07/06/12 (0)

RE: Compression had nothing to do with it. - Dave Pogue 14:15:44 07/05/12 (5)

One must be a non-sneering type of personality to understand it. - Poles Apart 21:33:30 07/05/12 (4)

One must, must one. - Dave Pogue 04:29:12 07/06/12 (3)

Inquiring minds...? - Tony Lauck 07:29:03 07/06/12 (2)

RE: Inquiring minds...? - Dave Pogue 08:04:49 07/06/12 (1)

RE: Inquiring minds...? - Tony Lauck 08:55:18 07/06/12 (0)

I don't see a "real" contradiction here - jfz 11:26:18 07/05/12 (0)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - Dave Pogue 06:25:35 07/05/12 (17)

That's an unfair portrayal - Poles Apart 13:51:38 07/05/12 (2)

Let's just say they were ... - Dave Pogue 14:37:46 07/05/12 (1)

RE: Let's just say they were ... - Jwm 16:02:53 07/05/12 (0)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - dave789 10:23:49 07/05/12 (11)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - Dave Pogue 10:43:34 07/05/12 (10)

Harry Pearson used it as "proof" - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 05:45:14 07/10/12 (3)

"The cracked spindle thing." No such thing was ever posited. - Poles Apart 19:45:50 07/10/12 (2)

RE: "The cracked spindle thing." No such thing was ever posited. - Tony Lauck 09:55:51 07/11/12 (1)

Quite so (what you say)! NT - Poles Apart 10:41:38 07/12/12 (0)

"Amazingly, some of the audio mags took it seriously..." - Poles Apart 21:38:57 07/05/12 (4)

So why didn't you name them? - Dave Pogue 04:32:55 07/06/12 (1)

A useful form of play - Tony Lauck 07:45:44 07/06/12 (0)

RE: "Amazingly, some of the audio mags took it seriously..." - dave789 21:44:00 07/05/12 (1)

The former, but the latter is at least partially true too. NT - Poles Apart 10:42:42 07/06/12 (0)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - mls-stl 18:05:08 07/05/12 (0)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - Tony Lauck 08:28:07 07/05/12 (1)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - Dave Pogue 08:43:42 07/05/12 (0)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - tom.dennehy 05:51:29 07/05/12 (1)

RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - Jwm 16:04:49 07/05/12 (0)

Post a Message!