In Reply to: That "AES paper" was blatantly flawed garbage. NT posted by Poles Apart on July 7, 2012 at 10:34:04:
Just curious, but what were the errors in the paper?
Seems to me that if you're going to call a work "blatantly flawed", then you should provide some detail concerning the nature of your disagreement.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: That "AES paper" was blatantly flawed garbage. - mls-stl 08:00:54 07/08/12 (3)
- See the 175 posts (alas soon to be more) - Tony Lauck 08:46:53 07/08/12 (2)
- Thanks... - mls-stl 09:03:07 07/08/12 (1)
- Well you asked... kinda soon to toss the ball out of bounds isn't it? NT - Poles Apart 20:37:57 07/08/12 (0)