In Reply to: RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD posted by dave789 on July 5, 2012 at 10:23:49:
Yes, I'd say it was pretty weird. Amazingly, some of the audio mags took it seriously, or seemed to. The claim was Ms. Reilly's; Diamond supported it. Whether he ever recanted or apologized, I don't know.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - Dave Pogue 10:43:34 07/05/12 (10)
- Harry Pearson used it as "proof" - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 05:45:14 07/10/12 (3)
- "The cracked spindle thing." No such thing was ever posited. - Poles Apart 19:45:50 07/10/12 (2)
- RE: "The cracked spindle thing." No such thing was ever posited. - Tony Lauck 09:55:51 07/11/12 (1)
- Quite so (what you say)! NT - Poles Apart 10:41:38 07/12/12 (0)
- "Amazingly, some of the audio mags took it seriously..." - Poles Apart 21:38:57 07/05/12 (4)
- So why didn't you name them? - Dave Pogue 04:32:55 07/06/12 (1)
- A useful form of play - Tony Lauck 07:45:44 07/06/12 (0)
- RE: "Amazingly, some of the audio mags took it seriously..." - dave789 21:44:00 07/05/12 (1)
- The former, but the latter is at least partially true too. NT - Poles Apart 10:42:42 07/06/12 (0)
- RE: Dr. Diamond vs high rez not better than CD - mls-stl 18:05:08 07/05/12 (0)