In Reply to: Would this not imply that there should be one best design that is demonstrably superior? nt posted by Norm on October 1, 2007 at 11:17:06:
No. It would imply that normal designs under normal conditions are all the same in causing inaudible modifications to the signal (excluding the obvious).
If you were using the sound for purposes other than listening or the conditions were abnormal then there may be a case for considering the cable performance further. Or if you were developing marketing for the cable based on its actual performance but, then again, perhaps that would not be wise.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Would this not imply that there should be one best design that is demonstrably superior? nt - andy19191 11:31:28 10/01/07 (5)
- RE: Would this not imply that there should be one best design that is demonstrably superior? nt - morricab 09:15:11 10/02/07 (0)
- Is it not possible that other measures are needed especially if people hear a difference? nt - Norm 19:38:48 10/01/07 (3)
- RE: Is it not possible that other measures are needed especially if people hear a difference? nt - andy19191 23:58:24 10/01/07 (2)
- The key is "if people are imaging differences." What if they are not? - Norm 06:16:50 10/02/07 (1)
- RE: The key is "if people are imaging differences." What if they are not? - andy19191 07:27:50 10/02/07 (0)