In Reply to: Middle Section of article, "20th and 21st Century Science" posted by geoffkait on April 4, 2007 at 07:50:42:
HiThe reason I posted the link to this site originally was because of what they represent and to provoke thinking.
They have proven to scientific satisfaction, a number of things about “mind / matter†connections that had long been thought to be imaginary by “main stream scienceâ€.
The work I was aware of was mostly in effecting what would normally be random events like a million coin tosses. They found (thru the rigors of blind testing among others) that some people could influence a repeated random even, in a desired direction, to a degree which was not large but exceeds statistical significance.
More weirdly, this effect was not distance or time dependent.
None of these people had thought they had any special talent or ESP.For mainstream science, these folks not only proved the effect is real but its presence and a lack of mechanism opened a new can of intriguing worms, “how the heck does this work?â€
Could this explain “lucky†people I wonder, could this still unknown connection mechanism over time and space explain miracles or even God?
I can see why they wax philosophically.I think for hifi, there are at least two implications.
First, for some people, to some degree, ones thoughts CAN influence otherwise random things in the physical world, in a desired direction, to a small yet real degree.
How this is impacting the various elements in the reproduction chain based on your wants is a question as well as the possible cumulative influence of the musicians and engineers on the recording.
This would then make equipment design “for the masses†more complicated to the degree that some users could influence its actual performance in one direction or another.Second, that even something as abstract and intangible as ESP / telekinesis, can be proven to scientific satisfaction by using regular scientific methods like Blind Testing, to remove “prior knowledge†from the tests.
Real fans of hifi (maximizing the listening experience) should not be afraid of exploring where “wishful thinking†and “actually hearing it†diverge, sometimes only observable when there is a lack of prior knowledge.
Best,Tom Danley
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 21st Century Science - tomservo 17:56:59 04/05/07 (17)
- I love it when people actually DO science... - Wellfed 11:10:12 04/06/07 (6)
- here you go - tunenut 13:22:51 04/06/07 (5)
- From the horses mouth comes nothing I want on me. - tomservo 15:52:52 04/06/07 (3)
- I subscribe... - Wellfed 17:52:22 04/06/07 (1)
- "Again, in spite of that, we call this Friday good." "That" being, in this case... - clarkjohnsen 10:36:02 04/07/07 (0)
- all good thoughts - tunenut 17:25:48 04/06/07 (0)
- I'm on vacation... - Wellfed 14:13:12 04/06/07 (0)
- Re: 21st Century Science - May Belt 02:08:37 04/06/07 (8)
- May Belt: "For people interested in the history of scientific discoveries" .... You don't seem very interested to me - Richard BassNut Greene 16:52:14 04/08/07 (2)
- Nice try, troll. What's the matter, not getting enough attention at school? - Posy Rorer 21:21:15 04/08/07 (1)
- No sign of intelligent life in your post, ... Just mindless character attacks - Richard BassNut Greene 22:07:00 04/08/07 (0)
- Re: 21st Century Science - tomservo 09:00:02 04/07/07 (3)
- Re: 21st Century Science - geoffkait 11:45:35 04/07/07 (0)
- Re: 21st Century Science - May Belt 10:43:56 04/07/07 (1)
- Re: 21st Century Science - tomservo 12:27:25 04/07/07 (0)
- Scooter123: " I am an Applied Scientist and do not believe that your treatments work." What's belief got... - clarkjohnsen 13:42:50 04/06/07 (0)
- I thought I was raising my stereos volume telepathically once, then realized I was sitting on the remote - AJinFLA 18:41:28 04/05/07 (0)