Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - "How the Intelligent Chip Works - The Definitive Explanation" or... - Steve Eddy 22:12:27 05/24/05 (99)

• Re: "How the Intelligent Chip Works - The Definitive Explanation" or... - BS64 10:08:01 06/03/05 (7)
• However, Geoff forgot to mention... - KlausR. 01:50:31 06/05/05 (6)
• Chinese Whispers... - Wellfed 09:11:53 06/06/05 (5)
• I doubt it - BS64 09:56:35 06/08/05 (4)
• What attempt at ridicule?... - Wellfed 12:40:43 06/08/05 (3)
• Re: Learning disability - geoffkait 03:00:22 06/09/05 (2)
• talk about the pot calling the kettle black - BS64 09:52:48 06/09/05 (1)
• Re: Ouch, ouch! Ya got me that time, BS64 -- that really hurts (nt) - geoffkait 09:36:45 06/10/05 (0)
• That's even more ridiculous than all the non-explanations. nt - sjb 09:52:46 05/27/05 (2)
• Eclipsed in magnificance only by the dungheap at the feedlot - Al Sekela 14:30:55 05/27/05 (1)
• An interesting view that is deserving of serious consideration... - Wellfed 19:30:34 05/28/05 (0)
• Re: "How the Intelligent Chip Works - The Definitive Explanation" or... - Bob Wortman 20:06:59 05/26/05 (1)
• Quantum - toxicport.e 16:34:31 06/02/05 (0)
• *click* CLEANUP, AISLE FIVE! CLEANUP, AISLE FIVE! *click* nt - Steve Eddy 12:23:17 05/26/05 (0)
• Really how the intelligent chip works! ! ! - eds65gto 11:59:22 05/26/05 (0)
• Really how the intelligent chip works! ! ! - eds65gto 11:58:19 05/26/05 (0)
• Really how the intelligent chip works! ! ! - eds65gto 11:57:11 05/26/05 (0)
• Really how the intelligent chip works! ! ! - eds65gto 11:54:46 05/26/05 (0)
• Really how the intelligent chip works! ! ! - eds65gto 11:49:36 05/26/05 (0)
• Wow! pretty sophisticated technology for $15 a pop nt. - Robert Hamel 09:38:58 05/26/05 (0)
• On a similar note... - Jim Austin 05:56:40 05/26/05 (2)
• Re: On a similar note... - Steve Eddy 12:13:07 05/26/05 (1)
• Hmmm ... - bjh 13:21:12 05/26/05 (0)
• total and complete nonsense - tunenut 16:31:55 05/25/05 (0)
• Well then - bjh 15:13:10 05/25/05 (0)
• Hhhmmm - chris_w 12:46:06 05/25/05 (0)
• Mr. Chip, final round? - KlausR. 06:28:27 05/25/05 (66)
• If this explanation isn't satisfactory... - Wellfed 12:22:48 05/25/05 (59)
• I have serious doubts that the device works... - KlausR. 00:20:35 05/26/05 (3)
• I do believe that you are hearing something, I however do not believe that there is something that can be heard.?????? - Robert Hamel 09:34:13 05/26/05 (2)
• Re: I do believe that you are hearing something, I however do not believe that there is something that can be heard.???? - KlausR. 10:40:27 05/26/05 (0)
• It's all quite curious to be sure [nt] - Wellfed 10:10:15 05/26/05 (0)
• It doesn't take a rocket scientist to hear the effect? - Ken Perkins 13:29:39 05/25/05 (16)
• Re: It doesn't take a rocket scientist to hear the effect? - jneutron 13:33:19 05/25/05 (15)
• The irony - Ken Perkins 13:41:37 05/25/05 (14)
• Where's the irony? [nt] - Wellfed 20:34:03 05/26/05 (13)
• I know this may come as a bit of a shock to you but ... - bjh 07:50:05 05/27/05 (12)
• So where is the irony?... - Wellfed 10:57:28 05/27/05 (11)
• Re: So where is the irony?... - Ken Perkins 11:37:20 05/27/05 (10)
• Sorry... - Wellfed 12:31:52 05/27/05 (9)
• BTW ... - bjh 12:40:35 05/27/05 (8)
• I don't know... - Wellfed 14:01:03 05/27/05 (7)
• Re: I don't know... - john curl 18:58:17 05/28/05 (6)
• Re: I don't know... - bjh 22:22:42 05/28/05 (5)
• Re: I don't know... - john curl 13:59:45 05/29/05 (2)
• Why no further input??? - KlausR. 00:33:54 05/30/05 (0)
• Well - bjh 20:21:56 05/29/05 (0)
• While we're at it... - KlausR. 09:39:53 05/29/05 (1)
• Listen - bjh 10:11:40 05/29/05 (0)
• "It doesn't take a rocket scientist to hear the effect." - clifff 13:23:27 05/25/05 (37)
• Re: "It doesn't take a rocket scientist to hear the effect." - Wellfed 14:35:50 05/25/05 (36)
• I read the whole saga - line by line. - clifff 14:58:27 05/25/05 (35)
• Fantastic... - Wellfed 15:52:26 05/25/05 (1)
• And while you're at it... - Wellfed 20:27:14 05/25/05 (0)
• Re: I read the whole saga - line by line. - Steve Eddy 15:32:33 05/25/05 (32)
• Thank's Steve... - Wellfed 16:03:28 05/25/05 (31)
• Isn't he just a Doll! BTW, have you tried his Tao interconnect? nt - bjh 21:36:37 05/25/05 (30)
• He is... - Wellfed 23:45:16 05/25/05 (29)
• Do tell us more. - bjh 05:20:35 05/26/05 (28)
• My impressions... - Wellfed 10:08:30 05/26/05 (23)
• Thanks ... - bjh 10:26:33 05/26/05 (22)
• In the category of - rp1@surfnetusa.com 23:23:35 05/26/05 (18)
• Oh hey! Had a look at your Tao review posted over at CA ... - bjh 05:19:19 05/28/05 (7)
• Re: Oh hey! Had a look at your Tao review posted over at CA ... - rp1@surfnetusa.com 18:51:31 05/28/05 (5)
• Well ... - bjh 19:58:48 05/28/05 (4)
• Actually, what I hope - rp1@surfnetusa.com 22:14:04 05/28/05 (3)
• All good points, synergy, try it yourself, don't judge on $ alone, blah blah blah ... no argument, thanks for that. nt - bjh 23:39:23 05/28/05 (2)
• Hypergraphia. - Al Sekela 13:14:12 05/29/05 (1)
• Oh look, the Lord of Cable Lifters feels the need to pipe in. Perfect! LOL nt - bjh 13:28:13 05/29/05 (0)
• What do you mean by "as well"? [nt] - Wellfed 12:37:17 05/28/05 (0)
• Don't be so sure ... - bjh 07:36:18 05/27/05 (8)
• Re: Don't be so sure ... - Steve Eddy 10:36:55 05/27/05 (7)
• What you find interesting or infer from something - bjh 11:09:25 05/27/05 (6)
• Re: What you find interesting or infer from something - Steve Eddy 13:06:58 05/27/05 (5)
• Perhaps it - bjh 13:30:08 05/27/05 (4)
• Re: Perhaps it - Steve Eddy 14:14:57 05/27/05 (3)
• I see - bjh 14:33:02 05/27/05 (2)
• No, you don't. - Steve Eddy 16:14:29 05/27/05 (1)
• Sorry but while this latest twist and turn is mildly - bjh 16:59:54 05/27/05 (0)
• Re: In the category of - Steve Eddy 23:38:34 05/26/05 (0)
• Clarification... - Wellfed 11:36:02 05/26/05 (2)
• Apologetics are so unbecoming (better to have kept quite IMO) nt - bjh 12:40:51 05/26/05 (1)
• You asked... - Wellfed 20:17:23 05/26/05 (0)
• Re: Do tell us more. - Steve Eddy 09:53:04 05/26/05 (3)
• True story... - Wellfed 10:13:32 05/26/05 (0)
• Really! - bjh 10:12:12 05/26/05 (1)
• Re: Really! - Wellfed 10:16:05 05/26/05 (0)
• Re: Mr. Chip, final round? - jbmcb 10:37:32 05/25/05 (5)
• Talking about odds - KlausR. 02:08:55 05/26/05 (4)
• it's probably a joke - tunenut 10:09:29 05/26/05 (3)
• Probably????nt.. - jneutron 10:30:17 05/26/05 (0)
• The Schrodinger's Cat Explaination - jbmcb 10:25:00 05/26/05 (1)
• Re: The Schrodinger's Cat Explaination - toxicport.e 16:40:43 06/02/05 (0)
• Re: "How the Intelligent Chip Works - The Definitive Explanation" or... - Dave Pogue 05:21:45 05/25/05 (0)
• Oh come on now Steve . . . - Grillcloth 04:49:56 05/25/05 (2)
• Re: Oh come on now Steve . . . - Steve Eddy 09:00:43 05/25/05 (1)
• Oh, wink wink nt - Grillcloth 03:41:28 05/26/05 (0)
• Somehow, actual measurements of the effect on CD transparency are omitted. - Tom Dawson 22:51:42 05/24/05 (1)
• Re: Somehow, actual measurements of the effect on CD transparency are omitted. - Wellfed 15:55:23 05/25/05 (0)

Follow Ups

• What do you mean by "as well"? [nt] - Wellfed 12:37:17 05/28/05 (0)