In Reply to: Re: legitimate disagreement posted by geoffkait on May 7, 2005 at 15:37:52:
You misunderstand; I'm not saying every explanation should be accepted. I am saying, in this case, my statements have been rejected (by Klaus) because he has apparently made his mind up (on the subject of the Chip containing a quantum dot), so anything having to do with quantum dots or fluorescence or light-matter interaction is rejected.What I've seen for the most part has been Klaus asking a number of legitimate questions and getting little more than smarmy non-answers in return. At least when ther's any response at all. Most of his questions haven't even been given so much as a smarmy non-answer.
"Legitimate disagreement" is the key phrase. There can be no legitimate discussion of quantum dots without at least some legitimate "homework," as I call it. Doesn't that seem fair?No, it seems childish, and just another obfuscational tactic in order to continue playing the silly game you've been playing for months now in an effort to throw any obstacle you can think of in the road and avoid just coming out and saying "Ok, here's what's happening when the Chip is used..."
Continuing along the lines of "that cannot be" or "that is impossible" is not a legitimate form of disagreement in my book.Continuing along the lines? What the line has been has been "how can that be?" followed by "do your homework" ad nauseum. Then when Klaus has finally had is fill of your obfuscational bullshit, he finally wirtes you and the Chip off and then your next bullshit excuse is that Klaus has rejected all your statements.
Coming Soon! "How the Intelligent Chip Works - the Definitive Explanation" by Machina Dynamica
How long has that been up on your webpage? Going on a month or so now, yes? How much longer will it remain there without any accompanying "definitive explanation"? Until the brouhaha over the Chip blows over and you can just delete it and hope no one notices?
se
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: legitimate disagreement - Steve Eddy 17:30:20 05/07/05 (6)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 18:38:12 05/07/05 (5)
- "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - BS64 10:22:10 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - Steve Eddy 10:33:45 05/08/05 (1)
- "Simple. Tactics." - BS64 10:40:24 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - Steve Eddy 21:00:13 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 02:02:53 05/08/05 (0)