In Reply to: RE: Short memory - I'll assist posted by Jaundiced Ear on February 24, 2016 at 00:43:26:
Let's begin with your question:
but the critics and nay sayers all scatter and disappear when asked specifically what is the problem? I would really like to know.
No one scattered in any of the links I provided. They asked reasonable questions and in most cases, failed to get any response from the sorcerer.
But, where is the proof of that other than among the golden eared, armchair critics club?
Do you consider Thorsten Loesch of AMR to fit that description?
Can you demonstrate why we should worry about less than a 16 bit noise floor?
Tony explained that. Let's revisit the answer:
" If you want to measure low levels of jitter appropriate to 24 bit audio then there needs to be a much lower noise floor. "
So, you measure 24 bit gear using 16 bit resolution? Huh?
Also, as Tony indicated, he simply doesn't respond to valid questions about his methodology. Instead, his silence speaks for him.
So what is your hypothesis in linking to this post?
It follows Thorsten's unanswered question:
"How do you think your work shapes up in this regards?"
The recurring theme is that he doesn't acknowledge limitations of his amateur testing. He doesn't know what he doesn't know!
Are we really wasting our time squabbling about "signal" that occurs -140dB down?
Revisit answer regarding testing 24 bit gear.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Short memory - I'll assist - E-Stat 06:17:59 02/24/16 (4)
- I get it! At last it sinks in. - Jaundiced Ear 18:18:18 02/24/16 (3)
- Thorsten said it best - E-Stat 05:51:43 02/25/16 (2)
- RE: Thorsten said it best - Jaundiced Ear 22:21:20 02/25/16 (1)
- Feel free to differ with opinions - E-Stat 06:59:15 02/26/16 (0)