In Reply to: RE: Another example of their ignorance about digital audio posted by mls-stl on January 5, 2012 at 19:42:04:
I long ago tired of the COMPONENT OF THE MONTH CLUB that all of the "audiophile" publications have always been but in their defence TAS has had numerous articles about LP quality.
The first place I read about looking for certain stamper runs, etc. This was easily twenty years ago.
At their best these publications report what they hear. Nothing wrong with that. We can all speculate what is the cause of differences in sound but when we pontificate with assumed authority we can quickly make fools of ourselves.
Digital can be every bit as mysterious as analogue so we should not assume that technoology has all of the answers. And please, do not confuse technology with science ...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- TAS was very concerned with stamping quality of LPs - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 07:03:02 01/06/12 (2)
- RE: TAS was very concerned with stamping quality of LPs - mls-stl 09:05:42 01/06/12 (1)
- I agree with you completely - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 14:01:47 01/06/12 (0)