In Reply to: Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers posted by Wayne Parham on March 1, 2003 at 13:40:00:
Hi WayneI think your confused, the measurement I was referring to in my post was the higher resolution measurement, the one called
1MGPFRAlab.jpg, not the low res normalized response used to show the general shapes. Why not post the one I was referring to
instead?
Also, no comment on the LAB VS the others on the distortion, impulse response, phase response, maximum output etc.?
No comment on the lower corner F of the LAB, nothing about the greater output than the >2K$ bassmaxx?Not bad I would say for a low cost DIY project after all but hey, you can see it any way you want to..
You focus your downplay on the LAB sub but don't comment on the 15 dB deep notch in the bassmaxx response (and what that
does to everything).You also down play the low cutoff but you also seem to forget such indoor measurements are comparative only..
Outside in half space, even a single LAB sub is only -7 from the midband peak to the level at 30 Hz.
Like I said several times too, the horn I am playing with is new, it has an acoustic "trick:" and is NOT an LAB horn (although it
does have its drivers.)So far as time alignment and and acoustic phase etc., based on the lengths I have gone to explain how it works, there is clearly
nothing more I could say that will make "the light come on" for you. You have your "position" on time, if its not in the way of your
hearing, perhaps hearing the difference will do it for you, or not, we will see.
See you in LimaTom
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - tomservo 14:41:48 03/01/03 (28)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - Wayne Parham 20:42:18 03/01/03 (24)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - tomservo 08:58:52 03/03/03 (18)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - Wayne Parham 09:51:42 03/03/03 (17)
- What would you do instead Wayne ? - TDM 11:23:13 03/03/03 (16)
- Solution indicated by conditions - Wayne Parham 13:00:59 03/03/03 (15)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - TDM 17:27:49 03/03/03 (14)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - Wayne Parham 01:34:15 03/04/03 (13)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - tomservo 12:23:44 03/04/03 (11)
- LAB vs. Quad-18 at 30Hz - Wayne Parham 01:43:14 03/13/03 (0)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - Wayne Parham 15:50:17 03/04/03 (6)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - Mark Seaton 10:06:12 03/05/03 (5)
- Quotes of the Day - Wayne Parham 00:15:02 03/06/03 (4)
- Re:MisQuotes of the Day - tomservo 08:20:48 03/06/03 (3)
- No "spin" - Wayne Parham 15:09:37 03/06/03 (2)
- Re: No "spin" - carpenter 17:54:56 03/06/03 (1)
- Re: No "spin" - Wayne Parham 21:24:15 03/06/03 (0)
- Tomservo, are you saying Wayne's - Magnetar 15:43:55 03/04/03 (2)
- Re: Tomservo, are you saying Wayne's - tomservo 16:00:28 03/04/03 (1)
- Re: Tomservo, are you saying Wayne's - Magnetar 20:59:58 03/04/03 (0)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - TDM 05:38:17 03/04/03 (0)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - hancock 10:40:59 03/02/03 (1)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - carpenter 09:39:54 03/02/03 (3)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - Wayne Parham 15:45:57 03/02/03 (2)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - carpenter 16:33:00 03/02/03 (1)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - Wayne Parham 22:11:53 03/02/03 (0)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - hancock 16:14:03 03/01/03 (0)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - js 15:52:26 03/01/03 (1)
- Thank you masked man :-) NT - tomservo 06:40:49 03/02/03 (0)