In Reply to: Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers posted by tomservo on March 1, 2003 at 07:41:37:
Hello Tom!I wrote:
"All products that were represented performed well. The LAB Sub appears to be satisfactory, as were all the others. But all products were also beginning to rolloff at 40 Hz, with none of them better than 3dB down at this frequency. By 30 Hz, all horns represented were at least 10 dB down from their 80-100Hz midbass level. This is good response for a basshorn, but it is also important to point this out."
And you replied:
>> It's nice to point things out sometimes however I would suggest
>> you go back and look again. #1 The LAB sub is not "at least -10 at
>> 30 Hz" Look at the measurement 1MGPFRAlab.jpg again, that's 5 dB
>> per division not 10 dB.Here's the chart from the "shootout":
At 80-100Hz, the graph clearly shows 124dB. By 30Hz, the graph shows 114dB.
"10 dB down from the 80-100Hz midbass level."You took offense at my observation but the data speaks for itself. It would appear that the thing you would want to do is to have your particular description be the only one that's ever uttered. You demand that it be said the horn produces "+/-5dB between 30 and 220Hz" rather than the equally accurate description of "30Hz output is -10dB from the 80-100Hz midbass level."
As for "time alignment," I had written more comments and responses to your claims. But I removed them because I think that your representation here says it best. On the one hand, you promote the Unity saying it is a product unique because of supposed time alignment between adjacent subsystems within it. And then on the other hand, you say that the large LAB basshorn is capable of similar integration in this "time alignment" scheme. So I think it's better to just leave the readers with that thought to consider.
Take care!
Wayne
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - Wayne Parham 13:40:00 03/01/03 (29)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - tomservo 14:41:48 03/01/03 (28)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - Wayne Parham 20:42:18 03/01/03 (24)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - tomservo 08:58:52 03/03/03 (18)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - Wayne Parham 09:51:42 03/03/03 (17)
- What would you do instead Wayne ? - TDM 11:23:13 03/03/03 (16)
- Solution indicated by conditions - Wayne Parham 13:00:59 03/03/03 (15)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - TDM 17:27:49 03/03/03 (14)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - Wayne Parham 01:34:15 03/04/03 (13)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - tomservo 12:23:44 03/04/03 (11)
- LAB vs. Quad-18 at 30Hz - Wayne Parham 01:43:14 03/13/03 (0)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - Wayne Parham 15:50:17 03/04/03 (6)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - Mark Seaton 10:06:12 03/05/03 (5)
- Quotes of the Day - Wayne Parham 00:15:02 03/06/03 (4)
- Re:MisQuotes of the Day - tomservo 08:20:48 03/06/03 (3)
- No "spin" - Wayne Parham 15:09:37 03/06/03 (2)
- Re: No "spin" - carpenter 17:54:56 03/06/03 (1)
- Re: No "spin" - Wayne Parham 21:24:15 03/06/03 (0)
- Tomservo, are you saying Wayne's - Magnetar 15:43:55 03/04/03 (2)
- Re: Tomservo, are you saying Wayne's - tomservo 16:00:28 03/04/03 (1)
- Re: Tomservo, are you saying Wayne's - Magnetar 20:59:58 03/04/03 (0)
- Re: Solution indicated by conditions - TDM 05:38:17 03/04/03 (0)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - hancock 10:40:59 03/02/03 (1)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - carpenter 09:39:54 03/02/03 (3)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - Wayne Parham 15:45:57 03/02/03 (2)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - carpenter 16:33:00 03/02/03 (1)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - Wayne Parham 22:11:53 03/02/03 (0)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - hancock 16:14:03 03/01/03 (0)
- Re: Eminence LAB 12 drivers - js 15:52:26 03/01/03 (1)
- Thank you masked man :-) NT - tomservo 06:40:49 03/02/03 (0)