In Reply to: Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim posted by Magnetar on July 5, 2002 at 14:14:09:
Mike -I don't appreciate your tone, and find your opportunistic position is disgusting.
You know, the point you always drove into the ground with me and my designs, was my choice to push the upper limit of my conical horns. You always discounted my decision to allow them to be used past the point where the horn had unloaded.
But now, here, you side yourself in a debate with a group who has said that they believe their similarly shaped horns can be used through three subsystems - woofer, midrange and tweeter.
I don't appreciate your comments; It is clearly evident that they are strictly personal and not relevent to the discussion at hand.
Wayne
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:55:31 07/05/02 (18)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 09:18:20 07/06/02 (8)
- Change your mind again? - Wayne Parham 23:10:09 07/14/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:05:37 07/06/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 08:42:59 07/07/02 (5)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:01:00 07/08/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 04:28:53 07/08/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 12:45:35 07/08/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:28:22 07/08/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:37:21 07/08/02 (0)
- hard not to remember "the king of comb filtering"(nt) - Sam P. 07:10:54 07/06/02 (8)
- Re: LOL - Magnetar 09:21:07 07/06/02 (7)