In Reply to: Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim posted by DanWiggins on July 4, 2002 at 08:09:31:
Hi Dan,Thanks for taking the time to stop by.
Dan's breakdown spells it out quite concisely. I belive Wayne was confused in what was actually patented. It is not any one summary claim, but rather all summary claims and any dependent claims. Many of the claims use phrasing which refers to "a system as recited in claim #..." This translates that the referenced claim must first be met, and then the dependent claim.
Believe me, I've seen a fair number of loudspeaker designers take a first look and say "that can't work" only later to either measure or look further into what is being done and all concur that is does indeed work, and many have stated "I never would have thought of that!" The more insightful designers I have talked with who are working to solve similar problems have generally agreed and called the Unity Sumation Aperture "an elegantly simple solution."
Mark Seaton
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:57:06 07/04/02 (11)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 13:03:15 07/04/02 (10)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 22:53:34 07/04/02 (7)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:34:40 07/05/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 12:08:51 07/05/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:59:24 07/05/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:54:53 07/05/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:23:20 07/05/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:47:11 07/05/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:09:41 07/05/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Andre Jute 13:59:04 07/04/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:41:47 07/04/02 (0)