In Reply to: RE: going big, going down to 50 cycles- good idea? posted by weltersys on July 29, 2013 at 08:38:16:
Okay, thank you for the help. I think I have indeed made some wrong choices with the compression chamber volume and the rear volume because I just thought of limiting excursion. I think this new version is way better.
Also, efficiency is higher and response is smoother.
In order to tackle the excursion peak just under 40Hz it seems a butterworth filter at 46Hz with 48dB per octave is necessary if I want to keep the response fairly flat as it goes down.
I think the controller I will be using has that kind of option.can I get any more out of these EVM15Ls without going even larger?
Edits: 07/29/13 07/29/13 07/29/13 07/29/13
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: going big, going down to 50 cycles- good idea? - Gwen 18:35:00 07/29/13 (3)
- RE: going big, going down to 50 cycles- good idea? - weltersys 08:55:12 08/06/13 (2)
- RE: going big, going down to 50 cycles- good idea? - Gwen 11:33:24 08/06/13 (1)
- RE: 15L for what they do well - weltersys 12:11:39 08/07/13 (0)