In Reply to: RE: Using Science as a hook" posted by tomservo on August 10, 2011 at 07:10:26:
I have read many posts by geoffkait over the past few years. I can not recall a single case where he posted a technical explanation of how something worked or a technical analysis of a scientific, engineering or mathematical problem. I have no idea whether this is because he doesn't understand these fields in any depth or because he chooses not to demonstrate his understanding.
I try not to miss his posts, however. I find the controversy they spawn entertaining.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Using Science as a hook" - Tony Lauck 09:20:49 08/10/11 (15)
- RE: Using Science as a hook" - geoffkait 10:42:58 08/10/11 (2)
- RE: Using Science as a hook" - Tony Lauck 11:31:31 08/10/11 (1)
- RE: Using Science as a hook" - geoffkait 12:03:08 08/10/11 (0)
- RE: Using Science as a hook" - tomservo 10:22:51 08/10/11 (11)
- RE: Using Science as a hook" - geoffkait 10:30:14 08/10/11 (10)
- Tom makes real products you market aquarium gravel - Steyr 06:05:58 08/12/11 (8)
- "stick to deluding the faithful." - Analog Scott 09:08:05 08/12/11 (0)
- You're a a little late to the party - geoffkait 06:46:58 08/12/11 (6)
- RE: You're a a little late to the party - tomservo 07:01:32 08/12/11 (5)
- RE: You're a a little late to the party - geoffkait 07:53:32 08/12/11 (4)
- RE: You're a a little late to the party - tomservo 14:42:20 08/12/11 (3)
- RE: You're a a little late to the party - geoffkait 15:26:37 08/12/11 (2)
- RE: You're a a little late to the party - tomservo 17:40:56 08/12/11 (1)
- RE: You're a a little late to the party - geoffkait 19:43:02 08/12/11 (0)
- RE: Using Science as a hook" - tomservo 11:12:56 08/10/11 (0)