In Reply to: John, GMAB with your "S'phile is being singled out" implication. posted by Rick W on March 7, 2007 at 15:59:33:
>I addressed my question to you because *you* posted above, and *you*
>claimed my suggestion would be too "cumbersome".
Right. I still believe that to be the case, though I am thinking
about a page on the Stereophile website where that information could
be updated on a regular basis.
>I would have thought it was blatantly obvious that I'd like the
>same suggestion implimented at all other hifi mags/e-zines too.
Not obvious at all, given that all the questions have been addressed
to Stereophile. In response to those questions, those of us at
Stereophile who frequent this forum have been forthcoming about what
we have purchased and what we have on loan. In addition, Art Dudley
did the same in the March issue of Stereophile. Yet still the
questions come (not just from you, please note).
>Yes, the *current* lists from columnists Dudley & Marks were
>informative. But of course their lists could change 3/6/9 months
>from now with additional or different "loaners" and/or purchases.
I am not trying to hide anything. I merely think it appropriate for
you (and others) to address those same questions directly to editors
and writers for other magazines in order to see how readily those
people respond. Other than David Robinson at PF, no-one has uttered a
peep so far.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: John, GMAB with your "S'phile is being singled out" implication. - John Atkinson 06:32:28 03/08/07 (1)