Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - 1.6 xover inductor: sledgehammer vs north creek - paco 09:45:44 10/04/00 (18)

• Re: 1.6 xover inductor: sledgehammer vs north creek - MikeCh 10:00:56 10/04/00 (19)
• Re: 1.6 xover inductor: sledgehammer vs north creek - paco 10:14:05 10/04/00 (18)
• how can you pass judgemnet - kenk 16:09:05 10/04/00 (1)
• Re: how can you pass judgemnet - paco 23:55:41 10/04/00 (0)
• Re: 1.6 xover inductor: sledgehammer vs north creek - MikeCh 13:55:40 10/04/00 (15)
• inductor skin effect = nonsense (do a search) (nt) - paco 14:01:46 10/04/00 (14)
• cognoscendi quotes? CFAC experience. - Arbelos 15:34:12 10/07/00 (9)
• MG 3.3 XO: 250 Hz...! think about it. - Arbelos 04:13:23 10/08/00 (6)
• no hypothesis, just plain facts - paco 06:14:17 10/08/00 (5)
• link -> psychoacoustics & audibility thresholds. - Arbelos 07:55:28 10/10/00 (4)
• psychoacoustics?? maybe, but for everybody - paco 08:05:38 10/10/00 (3)
• some points to end the debate (hopefully) ... - Arbelos 16:26:25 10/11/00 (0)
• some points to end the debate (hopefully) ... - Arbelos 15:38:46 10/11/00 (1)
• ended - paco 00:43:08 10/12/00 (0)
• no place, gurus reluctant to critize hype (nt) - paco 00:11:11 10/08/00 (0)
• upper midrange? 1.6 xover point is 600hz!! (nt) - paco 00:08:06 10/08/00 (0)
• inductor skin effect (minor below 1khz) air core however - Mart 10:36:32 10/05/00 (2)
• Hawksford... skin- -> storage-effect... - Arbelos 15:48:56 10/07/00 (1)
• skin-smear-effect ... - Mart 06:36:25 10/10/00 (0)
• fasten your seat belts - not so fast, Paco! <nt> - Arbelos 15:43:39 10/04/00 (1)
• some cognoscendi dictum: north creek inductors better than alpha core (nt) - paco 00:00:04 10/05/00 (0)
• just believe me: I am another cognoscendus! ;-) where did you see it? <nt> - Arbelos 10:14:05 10/05/00 (0)

Follow Ups

• upper midrange? 1.6 xover point is 600hz!! (nt) - paco 00:08:06 10/08/00 (0)