In Reply to: RE: digital roomcorrection posted by hemholtz on January 19, 2011 at 11:10:17:
Yeah, I don't see any way you can compensate for comb filtering above a certain frequency, since it will change as you move your head relative to the room surfaces. So the best course seems to be to limit most room compensation to low frequencies. Even then, the corrections will only be good at one point in the room or will represent a compromise over a larger area.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: digital roomcorrection - josh358 08:37:06 01/20/11 (14)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - hemholtz 06:46:49 01/21/11 (11)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - josh358 07:39:24 01/21/11 (10)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - hemholtz 09:05:52 01/21/11 (9)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - josh358 11:45:32 01/21/11 (8)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - hemholtz 12:06:30 01/21/11 (7)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - josh358 15:50:28 01/21/11 (6)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - hemholtz 17:32:08 01/21/11 (5)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - josh358 18:01:16 01/21/11 (4)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - hemholtz 06:27:37 01/22/11 (3)
- RE: digital room correction - josh358 05:53:00 01/23/11 (2)
- RE: digital room correction - hemholtz 08:47:39 01/23/11 (1)
- RE: digital room correction - josh358 10:34:01 01/23/11 (0)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - hemholtz 11:12:28 01/20/11 (1)
- RE: digital roomcorrection - josh358 11:21:37 01/20/11 (0)