|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Here we go again. Ramping up to test Dawnrazor's Damping Tweak posted by Dawnrazor on May 27, 2010 at 07:11:45:
I don't expect much (real) change on the charts either. There were hardly any between p-pframes and no-frames. Yet the difference was day and night; and along the lines of what you describe with the damping vs none.
I measured just to make sure that things are where they should for compararisons. A major change, for example, would be very suspicious (change in position after adding dampers, did I kick a cable off, did my wife move something?...etc). Measurements can be quite deceiving. I have almost perfect flat scans of some settings that sound horrible.
MultiMagxxx came as I was looking for short descriptors for the comments I add with each measurement. The first numeric position is for 22ga, the second for 26ga and the third 30ga. For example, the 2 lines of 26ga for the tweeter are MultiMag020. I have yet to test a MultiMag100 and a MultiMag110 (break-in time is a bitc..)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Here we go again. Ramping up to test Dawnrazor's Damping Tweak - JBen 08:12:43 05/27/10 (1)
- RE: Here we go again. Ramping up to test Dawnrazor's Damping Tweak - Edge22 11:00:49 05/27/10 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
