Home Tweakers' Asylum

Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ.

Re: catt anomaly

63.25.21.93

Catt, I have followed your work for decades. I am not in a position to question or defend it, but I feel you do a disservice to yourself and the questions that you raise, by personalizing the criticisms and repeatedly poking at other personalities not in agreement with you.
You are well aware, more than most, that E/M theory, like any other area of science, is not perfectly understood.
This month, in the SF magazine 'ANALOG' July-Aug 2001, is a factual example of a noted scientist's attack of a young, brilliant, associate, (in this case, Subrahamanyan Chandrasekhar). Yet the associate turned out to be correct, which led to his receiving the Nobel prize for physics in 1983 (almost 50 years later).
Perhaps you will be recognized for your efforts, sooner or later.
What I am most interested in is: What effects can be shown that do not follow traditional E/M theory?



This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.