Re: "Protecting your trademark investment is standard corporate practice" - Caymus

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Long comment on Monster Cable - Ray Kimber 10:48:03 01/01/05 (97)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - GimmeABreak 13:40:48 01/06/05 (0)

Question for the legal weenies amoung us - david hull 12:21:01 01/02/05 (2)

Some trademark law basics - Nefertiti 02:22:33 01/04/05 (0)

Maybe it's so the startup won't get sued... - Caymus 13:35:38 01/02/05 (0)

Regardless of your position..... - Julien43 05:31:16 01/02/05 (1)

The usual hypocrites and Whited Sepulchres... - Al Sekela 08:30:15 01/02/05 (0)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:11:45 01/02/05 (3)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - f1 fan 04:33:20 01/03/05 (2)

And a Happy New Year to you! :0) [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:59:41 01/03/05 (1)

Re: And a Happy New Year to you! :0) [nt] - f1 fan 12:34:18 01/03/05 (0)

With all due respect - Rodney Gold 21:32:46 01/01/05 (5)

With the greatest possible respect... - john dem 06:49:34 01/02/05 (3)

Also with respect . . . - psgary 10:13:35 01/02/05 (2)

I do not disagree with your sentiments... - john dem 11:46:35 01/02/05 (1)

Excellent points - psgary 18:12:34 01/03/05 (0)

Re: With all due respect - JCS 03:09:22 01/02/05 (0)

Great post Ray! I strongly support your point of view. -NT - lancelot 19:28:42 01/01/05 (0)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - RobertB53 19:26:43 01/01/05 (0)

Seems to me you are projecting - Magnetar 19:17:17 01/01/05 (19)

Monster Cables ... in Walmart? - M. Lawton 08:08:04 01/02/05 (0)

What's it to you? - SBurton 21:18:23 01/01/05 (2)

I build my own cables from wire I use - Magnetar 05:07:35 01/02/05 (1)

Re: I build my own cables from wire I use - SBurton 08:24:03 01/02/05 (0)

Re: Seems to me you are projecting - Chris R 21:02:55 01/01/05 (3)

Re: Seems to me you are projecting - Magnetar 05:12:55 01/02/05 (2)

Re: Seems to me you are projecting - Julien43 06:13:09 01/02/05 (1)

Re: Seems to me you are projecting - Magnetar 07:45:31 01/02/05 (0)

I think there are a lot of hipocrites on here pretending to be so noble . N.T. - Corbu 19:52:47 01/01/05 (0)

I don't have a problem with criticism - Ray Kimber 19:52:01 01/01/05 (9)

You should at least defend your questioned position - Caymus 15:18:53 01/02/05 (6)

Re: You should at least defend your questioned position - Ray Kimber 15:32:43 01/02/05 (5)

Then donâ€™t go around trashing others... - Caymus 16:35:22 01/02/05 (4)

Re: Then donâ€™t go around trashing others... - Cetaele 19:15:58 01/03/05 (2)

His vicious attack looks very self-serving - Caymus 19:59:57 01/03/05 (1)

Re: His vicious attack looks very self-serving - Cetaele 20:47:56 01/03/05 (0)

Re: Then donâ€™t go around trashing others... - robert young 16:40:51 01/03/05 (0)

Wasn't meant to be a criticism - Magnetar 20:09:53 01/01/05 (1)

thanks for the correction, I mis-read your post - Ray Kimber 20:19:10 01/01/05 (0)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - f1 fan 19:06:16 01/01/05 (0)

I liked the green color under the clear plastic coating. - free.ranger 15:17:02 01/01/05 (0)

Hypocrite! - Steve Eddy 13:56:48 01/01/05 (0)

The pot is calling the kettle black - Caymus 13:10:17 01/01/05 (20)

"Protecting your trademark investment is standard corporate practice" - Julien43 05:49:13 01/02/05 (4)

Re: "Protecting your trademark investment is standard corporate practice" - Caymus 11:07:24 01/02/05 (3)

Re: "Protecting your trademark investment is standard corporate practice" - Steve Eddy 13:12:40 01/02/05 (0)

Then don't pick a common word as your title! - Dave Kingsland 12:28:31 01/02/05 (1)

My thoughts exactly (nt) - eungkim67 13:10:18 01/02/05 (0)

Re: The pot is calling the kettle black - CD 20:02:54 01/01/05 (0)

Re: The pot is calling the kettle black - Todd Krieger 14:00:12 01/01/05 (7)

Re: The pot is calling the kettle black - Chris R 19:16:41 01/01/05 (0)

Re: The pot is calling the kettle black - uw312@aol.com 15:21:00 01/01/05 (5)

Re: The pot is calling the kettle black - Steve Eddy 17:47:19 01/01/05 (4)

And likely outperforms the hell out of them - badman 05:20:11 01/02/05 (3)

Re: And likely outperforms the hell out of them - Magnetar 05:31:03 01/02/05 (2)

Remember - Monster cable is NOT "molecularly optimized" - Caymus 11:38:50 01/02/05 (1)

And the New Magnetar Series 4 has directional sacrosanct fusion! (nt) - Magnetar 15:03:22 01/02/05 (0)

I don't contest your point - Ray Kimber 13:32:03 01/01/05 (3)

Re: I don't contest your point - Chris R 19:56:14 01/01/05 (0)

Re: I don't contest your point - quickie 14:51:59 01/01/05 (1)

Kimber KCAG for me. - AbeCollins 18:13:04 01/01/05 (0)

nice of you to speak for "most people". - dave c 13:26:47 01/01/05 (1)

thanks... - BS64 15:07:55 01/01/05 (0)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - Scott n Vegas 12:49:33 01/01/05 (0)

I See Your Point.... - Todd Krieger 12:46:25 01/01/05 (1)

Here's a link to the Forbes article online - davew 12:30:13 01/01/05 (1)

Re: Here's a link to the Forbes article online - f1 fan 19:02:06 01/01/05 (0)

for what it's worth... - Cetaele 12:25:47 01/01/05 (2)

Definitions - badman 17:16:28 01/01/05 (1)

completely agree (nt) - Cetaele 18:21:45 01/01/05 (0)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - uw312@aol.com 12:04:37 01/01/05 (1)

It ought to work like that, but doesn't. - clifff 14:07:54 01/01/05 (0)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - Yipean 11:51:40 01/01/05 (0)

Question about Monster Cable and Monster Worldwide - PabloP 11:51:08 01/01/05 (7)

Re: Question about Monster Cable and Monster Worldwide - 49ersFan 14:12:35 01/06/05 (0)

see this post - CD 12:00:35 01/01/05 (1)

Well - PabloP 12:11:47 01/01/05 (0)

Re: Question about Monster Cable and Monster Worldwide - Yipean 11:57:10 01/01/05 (3)

Yup, they misnamed the stadium - unrulyjulie 14:19:16 01/01/05 (1)

Re: Yup, they misnamed the stadium - Steve Eddy 14:41:35 01/01/05 (0)

Then again - PabloP 12:02:39 01/01/05 (0)

Monster cables,good.....but never brilliant !! - Blue Bull 11:49:14 01/01/05 (0)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - Chris R 11:42:06 01/01/05 (0)

This will be the longest thread in AA history (nt) - free.ranger 11:35:45 01/01/05 (1)

Not likely... - Cetaele 12:54:34 01/01/05 (0)

We're mad as hell. Not going to take it any longer... - SBurton 11:32:15 01/01/05 (0)

Articulately put. - unrulyjulie 11:05:12 01/01/05 (1)

Re: Articulately put. - david hull 12:11:24 01/02/05 (0)

Re: Long comment on Monster Cable - John Atkinson 11:00:36 01/01/05 (9)

I have never owned monster cable products but I see no problem with a company protecting their name .(nt) - fortysomething 12:27:38 01/01/05 (2)

Suing unrelated businesses over a commonplace word isn't protecting your name. - badman 14:51:28 01/01/05 (1)

I'm sorry, your right. I did'nt realize it was an unrelated product. - fortysomething 15:34:02 01/01/05 (0)

So what do you feel is the best course of action? ... - gonefishin 12:06:00 01/01/05 (4)

What to do - Rodney Gold 22:38:43 01/01/05 (0)

How about picketing Best Buy, or whoever it is that sells more Monster Cable than anyone else? n.t. - rupertdacat 12:15:58 01/01/05 (2)

Re: How about picketing Best Buy, or whoever it is that sells more Monster Cable than anyone else? n.t. - Jefe 13:40:29 01/01/05 (1)

That's a good idea. - rupertdacat 17:18:55 01/01/05 (0)

in the past, i have recommended.. - hifitommy 11:53:01 01/01/05 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: "Protecting your trademark investment is standard corporate practice" - Caymus 11:07:24 01/02/05 (3)

Re: "Protecting your trademark investment is standard corporate practice" - Steve Eddy 13:12:40 01/02/05 (0)

Then don't pick a common word as your title! - Dave Kingsland 12:28:31 01/02/05 (1)

My thoughts exactly (nt) - eungkim67 13:10:18 01/02/05 (0)