I started a thread on this which has become polluted by know-it-alls & various numbskulls with gripes. As a result any listening impressions of this tweak are lost in the "noise" of the chattering numbskullsSo here's a thread (which will hopefully avoid the "noise" of numbskulls) in which to report on your experience with this modification.
I have repeated the modification details below from the other thread
I was asked for details of an easy & reversible modification to the Regen that greatly improves its sound quality.This is not another PS to plug into the DC input of the Regen - it's a bypass of the 3.3V on-board regulator with a 3.3V LiFePo4 battery supply. I know the regulators are said to be state of the art but a LiFePO4 battery smashes this out of the park.
Obviously you need to open up the Regen to connect a battery to the output from the 3.3V regulator & ground, thus bypassing the regulator. There is a ceramic capacitor C3 right at the output of that regulator - the reg at the top of the pic - REG33.
There's a copper via with a 5 beside it at top of that C3 capacitor - this is the GROUND point for connection. The other side of the capacitor is the connection to 3.3V positive (the one with two vias side-by-side). You need to attach the battery + & - poles to these points - soldering to these vias is best. It's very easy to reverse this if desired.
This powers the USB hub chip & the clock which is all that's needed for audio devices that don't need USB Vbus 5V power for signalling or for powering the audio device. You can still do this tweak but you need to supply the 5V separately
BTW, I forgot to include this: this provides a far superior sound than using 2 of the same batteries to power the Regen through its DC input so it's not just the batteries that make the difference but bypassing the REG33 also. This signifies, to me, that the regulator is a limiting factor.
I don't exactly know how a better PS on the Regen's clock & USB hub chip translates into a better sound downstream at the audio device - I don't believe any measurements have yet revealed this?
Try it & post your reports
Edit: I am reminded by some of the posts on this thread to warn people that they do this at their own risk & that they should be somewhat competent in DIY to do this. These batteries can put out a lot of power - treat them with respect - as you would a car battery - they are that powerful
Edit: To find suitable batteries do a search for "26650 LiFePO4 batteries" - make sure they are 3.2V & get the ones with tabs welded to the ends (they are easier to solder a wire to). Something like this http://www.ebay.com/itm/2X-26650-3-2V-3-3AH-LiFePO4-Rechargeable-Battery-w-tabs-/320657847254?hash=item4aa8b273d6:g:puoAAOxyPH9RvsJ2
You need to trickle charge the battery with a 3.3V regulated supply. This is just an ordinary 3.3V supply, NOT a LiFePO4 battery charger (a LiFePO4 battery charger will output 3.6V which you don't want)
Finally, if you want to make this permanent, you will need to put a switch after the battery that turns the Regen on/off unless you want to leave it on permanently
Edit: I also see John Swenson has posted about this & he is correct. So let me reiterate what I originally proposed
- trickle charge the LiFePO4 battery with a regulated 3.3V PS permanently connected, NOT a LiFePO4 battery charger (thus avoiding > 3.3V)
- I didn't propose using the Regen's onboard 3.3V regulators as the trickle charger but when people asked about using it, I suggested trying it. Once this regulator is ONLY ever trickle charging, there should be no strain on that regulator chip.
- Don't allow the batteries to go low in charge. This could happen if you don't have the 3.3V trickle charger connected/powered & you are running the Regen off the battery. If you are going to store it away for a period of time then disconnect the battery from the unpowered charger.If these recommendations are followed this should operate without a hitch, no need for battery bypass capacitors etc.
NOTE: If you allow the battery to run low (you should never let it run lower than 2.7V) you need a different approach to recharging/reconditioning back to 3.3V. As pointed out by JS these batteries will attempt to draw a significant current from any PS that is connected to charge them. Thus the 3.3V PS needs to be self-limiting & this is probably where you can usefully use a LiFePO4 battery charger while the battery is disconnected from the Regen (i.e switched off)
As I said, this shouldn't be needed if you permanently trickle charge the battery
Edits: 11/30/15 11/30/15 12/01/15 12/01/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 06:21:15 11/27/15 (90)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - Tims 21:58:02 11/30/15 (1)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 23:13:33 11/30/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - Bob_C 09:36:35 11/29/15 (8)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 09:48:11 11/29/15 (7)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - Bob_C 10:04:35 11/29/15 (6)
- So why does jkeny not complain - fmak 08:49:40 11/30/15 (3)
- RE: So why does jkeny not complain - Ryelands 08:56:28 11/30/15 (2)
- OTOH, when Abe and fmak agree on something... - Ivan303 14:22:36 12/01/15 (1)
- RE: OTOH, when Abe and fmak agree on something... - Ryelands 14:53:10 12/01/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 10:26:27 11/29/15 (1)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - Bob_C 14:05:22 11/29/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - Bob_C 18:16:56 11/27/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 08:32:26 11/27/15 (24)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 09:52:51 11/27/15 (8)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 12:14:36 11/27/15 (7)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 05:08:15 11/29/15 (6)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 05:47:28 11/29/15 (5)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 06:12:21 11/29/15 (4)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 06:22:04 11/29/15 (3)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - Tony Lauck 11:19:57 11/29/15 (2)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - ahendler 19:21:49 11/29/15 (1)
- That would be my first choice as well... - Ivan303 09:04:59 12/03/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 09:14:04 11/27/15 (14)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 05:03:05 11/28/15 (9)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 14:45:21 11/28/15 (3)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 16:05:38 11/28/15 (2)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 16:08:39 11/28/15 (1)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 16:23:02 11/28/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - Bob_C 09:20:05 11/28/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - chopper87@aol.com 08:55:35 11/28/15 (1)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 10:44:46 11/28/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 05:43:24 11/28/15 (1)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 06:30:04 11/28/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 09:18:19 11/27/15 (3)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 09:27:20 11/27/15 (2)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 09:36:14 11/27/15 (1)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - theob 09:44:29 11/27/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - chopper87@aol.com 07:05:48 11/27/15 (52)
- What you lose is - fmak 21:27:29 11/28/15 (50)
- RE: What you lose is - jkeny 03:57:12 11/29/15 (49)
- This is not a forum - fmak 05:53:07 11/29/15 (48)
- Maybe you should read the rules - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 07:12:24 11/29/15 (47)
- RE: Maybe you should read the rules - fmak 07:23:22 11/29/15 (46)
- Readers are free to draw obvious conclusions about personalities behind the posts. - Tony Lauck 11:15:42 11/29/15 (5)
- So why hasn't J kenny accused you of - fmak 00:45:36 11/30/15 (4)
- RE: So why hasn't J kenny accused you of - jkeny 09:22:57 11/30/15 (3)
- LOL - fmak 10:20:05 11/30/15 (2)
- FMAK, take a couple of weeks off and cool down a bit... - Chris Garrett 19:45:33 12/01/15 (0)
- RE: LOL - racerxnet 11:08:22 11/30/15 (0)
- RE: Maybe you should read the rules - Ryelands 08:56:38 11/29/15 (2)
- RE: Maybe you should read the rules - chopper87@aol.com 15:50:39 11/29/15 (1)
- Since you make cables - fmak 00:58:21 11/30/15 (0)
- You're absolutely right - AbeCollins 07:58:12 11/29/15 (36)
- +1... - Ivan303 11:11:23 12/01/15 (0)
- What makes it wrong - fmak 03:49:11 11/30/15 (0)
- RE: You're absolutely right - Bob_C 09:57:12 11/29/15 (33)
- RE: You're absolutely right - AbeCollins 13:03:20 11/29/15 (32)
- RE: You're absolutely right - Bob_C 13:54:37 11/29/15 (31)
- I believe batteries most relevant to this discussion..... - Beef Guinness Cutie Pie 14:06:45 12/01/15 (0)
- The big difference - fmak 00:50:39 11/30/15 (0)
- RE: You're absolutely right - AbeCollins 13:59:59 11/29/15 (28)
- RE: You're absolutely right - Bob_C 14:14:44 11/29/15 (27)
- RE: You're absolutely right - AbeCollins 14:24:19 11/29/15 (26)
- RE: You're absolutely right - Bob_C 14:34:02 11/29/15 (25)
- RE: You're absolutely right - AbeCollins 14:46:26 11/29/15 (24)
- RE: You're absolutely right - Bob_C 14:53:17 11/29/15 (23)
- RE: You're absolutely right - AbeCollins 14:55:48 11/29/15 (22)
- RE: You're absolutely right - Bob_C 15:03:34 11/29/15 (21)
- RE: You're absolutely right - AbeCollins 15:39:47 11/29/15 (20)
- RE: You're absolutely right - fmak 01:03:42 11/30/15 (0)
- RE: You're absolutely right - jkeny 15:51:04 11/29/15 (18)
- RE: You're absolutely right - AbeCollins 08:10:15 11/30/15 (9)
- RE: You're absolutely right - jkeny 09:01:53 11/30/15 (8)
- RE: You're absolutely right - AbeCollins 11:31:27 11/30/15 (7)
- RE: You're absolutely right - jkeny 11:47:04 11/30/15 (5)
- RE: You're absolutely right - theob 17:33:56 11/30/15 (4)
- RE: You're absolutely right - jkeny 23:39:08 11/30/15 (1)
- RE: You're absolutely right - theob 01:33:27 12/01/15 (0)
- RE: You're absolutely right - fmak 21:31:35 11/30/15 (0)
- RE: You're absolutely right - sonics 18:35:37 11/30/15 (0)
- RE: You're absolutely right - racerxnet 11:36:53 11/30/15 (0)
- RE: You're absolutely right - sonics 16:58:57 11/29/15 (7)
- RE: You're absolutely right - jkeny 17:45:18 11/29/15 (6)
- RE: You're absolutely right - sonics 22:35:08 11/29/15 (5)
- RE: You're absolutely right - chopper87@aol.com 08:03:45 12/01/15 (4)
- RE: You're absolutely right - sonics 12:12:17 12/01/15 (2)
- RE: You're absolutely right - chopper87@aol.com 19:26:08 12/01/15 (0)
- RE: You're absolutely right - theob 13:31:06 12/01/15 (0)
- RE: You're absolutely right - fmak 08:30:53 12/01/15 (0)
- RE: Listening impressions of Regen battery tweak - jkeny 07:11:40 11/27/15 (0)