Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
In Reply to: Re: an active (or passive)crossover is: posted by Davey on March 22, 2001 at 12:28:13:
Clyde posted this URL (scroll halfway down) with a BG ribbon XO schematic.http://www.audio-x-stream.com/faqbase.html#FAQ Planar Magnetic Drivers
I made a quick drawing of what the XO board looks like and the parts. Here's the link for the drawing.
http://www.geocities.com/alinoge2000/bgxo.htm
Follow Ups:
If you go to an active crossover, i'd obviously use the Audio X-stream crossover, which incorporates a tuneable notch filter for the B-Gs. I forgot about it. Better would be only a tube crossover IMO.I think that the passive notch filter ahead of the speaker is probably a severe limit on sonic quality - i prefer to implement such filters with a parallel 'sink' circuit, not a blocking 'tank' circuit - if i have to.
It is probable that a text-book crossover will work quite well from the start on the B-Gs, because they have a rel. well behaved fundamental resonance at ca. 130 Hz, so the used crossover is about two octaves away, and the bass will be at least 2 octaves away from its upper limit. The used XO frequency sits nicely (and sensibly IMO) between both drivers lower resp. upper limit. A bit of tuning will probably still be necessary.
What preamp and amp do you want to use?
Hi Arbelos, here's the link to my earlier post with the details about my system:http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/mug/messages/13002.html
Where can I find about the Audio X-treme?
Thanks.
http://www.Audio-x-stream.com/cxrframe.html#Clearview Equalizing Crossovers
Audio-X-Stream is no longer. I tried for almost a year to buy a Clearview for my CALS Platinums. I have since given up and I'm building my own.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: