![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
165.21.154.9
I see that many interconnects use coaxial designs where the shield is used as the ground connection between RCAs. Does signal actually flows through the ground cable in an interconnect? If so, I believe using the same cable for BOTH live and ground will yield a better sound, right?
![]()
Follow Ups:
The audio signal flows thru the so-called "ground" just as much as it does the "hot" wire.See:
About cable "ground":
http://www.AudioAsylum.com/audio/cables/messages/503.htmlThis is why a twisted pair with an overall shield can usually outperform a simple coaxial type cable sonically, unless the coax has the benefit of far superior materials.
Unfortunately, interchassis ground currents can also end up flowing in the "ground" leg, and this can mess with the normally rather simple requirements of transfering an audio signal cleanly.
IMO, the best-sounding cables are made from 2 wires (1 for 'signal' and 1 for 'return') with a shield over the top if you like/need a shielded IC. This shield should be connected to the RCA barrel at one end only to avoid it becoming part of the 'return'.I believe cales like this are called "psuedo-balenced" ICs?
Regards,
...positive, common/neutral, and a shield. The latter is sometimes connected separately to the equipment but more commonly is connected to neutral only at the driven-equipment end.Generally, cable with conductors that are identical for positive and neutral (or that use BETTER conductors for neutral, such as Audioquest's 3-conductor designs) sound best. Some of those are shielded, some not. Cable that uses its shield for neutral generally is lower cost and lower sound quality.
-------------------------------------------------------
Tin-eared audiofool and obsessed landscape fotografer.
http://community.webshots.com/user/jeffreybehr
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: