Cable Asylum

Re: Cables cost should be system independent.

138.88.157.23

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Cable Asylum ]

ajedwardsjr

(A)

In Reply to: Cables cost should be system independent. posted by Tony Montana on September 17, 2005 at 20:21:28:

I am really not asking what they should be. Everyone has their own ideas about this. And, I, for one, respect other people' ideas about what works for them.
Really, I am just asking what is the percentage that you ended up with? If you looked around, and added stuff up, what did your cables and interconnects run you? What percentage of your system?
This is just for fun. I do not mean to educate anyone, nor do I care to have anyone try to educate me. I don't want to hear a current theory, or a criticism of an old theory. Just numbers. Just for fun.

Follow Ups:

Thank you for feedback. - Tony Montana 21:26:30 09/17/05 (2)
Just for fun, my cable Vs system cost is about 10% (2 Ch :)
- BTW - E-Stat 07:17:23 09/18/05 (1)
  with respect to your deleted posts, he is referring to speaker cables and ICs not power cords.
  rw
  - I didn't read it that way initially - mt10425 07:50:35 09/18/05 (0)
    But if that's the case, then it drops to about 5%.
    
    "If it ain't music, it might as well be a barkin' dog"

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

You can not post to an archived thread.