I want know if I can use the ECC189 for replace the ECC88.
The two tubes have very close characteristics, but the ECC189 have variable mu. Anyone make tests for verify if the ECC89 have a distortion sound, or have a assumption about the poor sound quality ?
Sorry for bad english...Aldovan
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - ECC189 replace a ECC88 ? - Aldovan 12:35:56 06/20/05 (13)
- Re: ECC189 replace a ECC88 ? - Matts_ 16:47:07 06/24/05 (0)
- Really good article online - morinix 09:02:09 06/21/05 (2)
- Re: Really good article online - Aldovan 10:54:30 06/22/05 (1)
- Re: Really good article online - morinix 08:43:27 06/23/05 (0)
- Re: ECC189 replace a ECC88 ? - Gingertube 17:04:55 06/20/05 (1)
- I agree 100% - one of the reasons the ECC88/6DJ8/6922... - Allen Wright 06:01:20 06/21/05 (0)
- Re: ECC189 replace a ECC88 ? - Pär 13:39:02 06/20/05 (6)
- a PCC88 is a better substitute for a ECC88... - Allen Wright 06:04:58 06/21/05 (3)
- Re: a PCC88 is a better substitute for a ECC88... - Pär 13:59:26 06/21/05 (2)
- ECC88 should work at 6,95V and a PCC88 should work at 6,35( - Allen Wright 03:24:58 06/22/05 (1)
- Re: ECC88 should work at 6,95V and a PCC88 should work at 6,35( - Pär 04:49:16 06/22/05 (0)
- Re: ECC189 replace a ECC88 ? - Aldovan 13:45:10 06/20/05 (1)
- Re: ECC189 replace a ECC88 ? - Pär 14:12:22 06/20/05 (0)