|
Vintage Asylum Classic gear from yesteryear; vintage audio standing the test of time. |
|
|
|
Vintage Asylum Classic gear from yesteryear; vintage audio standing the test of time. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Scott 299 or Eico HF 81- which is better? posted by Hot Glass Audio on March 8, 2006 at 23:08:56:
Thanks for the input. I really like the LK-48 and the 222, which I have only recently learned of. But where to find them? There is some luck involved. I suppose there are people on this list that have examples for sale.I am tempted to try the ceramic discs again in my HF81 just for comparison but unfortuantely I cut the old ones off close to the disc - it would take some fancy solderin' to put them back in. Close to the disc, could I damage the cap with heat from the soldering gun? I haven't found new disc caps with the same value - .025uf.
I have my eyes open for tube amps that I can work on.
The HF81 has a poor-sounding phono section right now - I will try new tubes first.Pete
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Scott 299 or Eico - Thanks - Peter I 08:40:48 03/09/06 (8)
- Re: Scott 299 or Eico - Thanks - Hot Glass Audio 17:09:15 03/09/06 (0)
- One question about caps... - PeterI 09:09:55 03/09/06 (6)
- Can't respond to your e-mail - Hot Glass Audio 23:46:51 03/09/06 (1)
- Re: Can't respond to your e-mail - PeterI 08:40:00 03/10/06 (0)
- in the old days, pF was called 'uuF' - mhardy6647 09:33:57 03/09/06 (3)
- I thought the decimal point moved 6 places ... - PeterI 09:41:31 03/09/06 (2)
- yah, six decimal places, that's the ticket - mhardy6647 12:17:47 03/09/06 (1)
- Re: yah, six decimal places, that's the ticket - PeterI 13:58:41 03/09/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
